Template talk:Milecastles

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Milecastles redirect.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Military history: Fortifications / British / European / Classical Template‑class

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Template

This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Removed milefortlets 6, 7 and 8[edit]

I've removed redlinks for Milefortlets 6, 7 and 8 from the template. As I've explained on the pages for Milefortlet 5 and Milefortlet 9, there is no evidence for Milefortlets 6, 7 and 8. The coastline here is interrupted by Moricambe Bay. It was thought that they may have been eroded away but in more modern times the view has been that the forts never existed. It looks a bit odd on the template, but it seemed better to remove these supposed forts, rather than create stubs pages on forts which don't exist. Pasicles (talk) 18:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed milefortlet 26[edit]

I've also removed the redlink for Milefortlet 26. As explained on the Pastscape entry for Milefortlet 26. There seems to have been confusion on how many fortlets there were south of Milefortlet 23. Anyway, long story cut short, the whole system is believed to finish at Tower 25B. Pasicles (talk) 18:25, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]