Template talk:New York Dolls

Restructuring members section to reflect current lineup

Yes, I realize that you can make a case for listing the 'classic' (i.e., 1971-1975) members in the top, emboldened line of the Dolls' template, but I would argue that the current members belong in that line. Granted, the band's most popular output was recorded by the 'classic' lineup members, but the current incarnation has now lasted longer (five years) and released as many records (two full-lengths), and template boxes should consistently reflect the band's present status if it is applicable, with 'classic' lineups only belonging on the top line in those of inactive groups, and then only in debatable cases. I will shuffle the info around to reflect this in a week or so if no one writes in and objects. I will also add the '75-'77 members who are omitted from this list presently. Colinclarksmith (talk) 02:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and altered the 'members' listing to reflect the current, active lineup. Colinclarksmith (talk) 00:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]