Template talk:New discussion

Template:New discussion is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Delete/keep, 4 May 2023, see discussion.
No consensus, 2019 August 17, see discussion.
No consensus, 3 December 2013, see discussion.

Articles for creation

	This template was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This template was accepted on 10 October 2008 by reviewer Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk · contribs).

Template-protected edit request on 30 March 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please apply this diff to allow overriding the default text "Start a new discussion thread". See /testcases. —⁠andrybak (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to find any transclusions (another search), which use any of the parameters of this template, and found none. It might make more sense to use the second parameter for override: Special:Diff/948116431/948119678. —⁠andrybak (talk) 07:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Andrybak:

done and for the sake of older Wikipedians who might just use the 2nd parameter from memory, we went with your first suggestion. P.I. Ellsworth ed. ^put'r there 16:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 9 August 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hello,

Please see the sandbox of this template for a change I have made. I replaced the information icon with a green plus icon. My rationale for doing this is that this isn't a messagebox containing information; therefore, the information icon is probably not suitable. I think the plus icon is better, but the box could also simply have no image at all – this would, however, mean that the |textstyle= parameter needs to be added, with the "padding" option. I tried this before with 0.5em and it seemed to be about the same size as one with an image. Before making the change, please let me know which option you prefer. If you have objections to both, please mention them. Thanks, DesertPipeline (talk) 12:09, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Elli (talk | contribs) 16:23, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) DesertPipeline (talk) 07:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removal from non-user talk pages

As discussed at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_7#Template:New_message, this template should not be used on non-user talk pages. The reason for this is that the default UI handles this better, without confusing new editors about the locations of buttons on each talk page. Additionally, this adds to the already bloated top of talk pages which causes banner blindness. Gonnym (talk) 18:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Plrease restore the functionality removed in January, so that this can be used in WP and WT namespaces. The rationale that the tab "New discussion" is enough, is clearly not the case, since many pages on WP and WT namespaces have custom coded versions of what this template does. Therefore it would be better if it were a standard template instead of having custom code lying all over the place. The rationale for removing the functionality from article talk pages was too many banners, which is not what usually appears on WP and WT pages, instead there's a bunch of instructions and a link to press to enter a new discusssion. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 15:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The usages were removed from project pages per the TfD. I oppose the above edit request. Editors should not invent templates that the default UI already handles, and by doing so, make the experience of new editors harder. Gonnym (talk) 19:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: while the consensus at the TfD was unclear, "(limited discussion etc)", it is very clear that this needs further discussion as recommended at the TfD. So please garner the needed consensus before using the {{edit template-protected}} template again. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. ^put'r there 05:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request for dark mode compatibility

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Kindly remove background-color: white; for dark mode compatibility. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 12:15, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Fixed for dark-mode. Since the background was not removed, marking this technically as not-done. Sohom (talk) 19:58, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]