Template talk:Rough Draft Studios

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Animation / American (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the American animation work group.
 
WikiProject Futurama (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Futurama, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futurama articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Related companies[edit]

Ok, so, perhaps "related companies" should be defined -- or renamed. "Related companies", I would imagine, would be limited to companies having worked with RDS or on the same project as RDS. Whether all the currently listed "related companies" fit this description, I don't know. It just seems a bit over-length. Just throwing that out there. -- Chickenmonkey X  sign?  17:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Navboxes should consist of links between articles that a reader would be likely to want to go to from the article they are currently on. Navboxes should also be inclusive enough to encompass the whole of a subject without becoming watered down with extraneous links to articles which may have a loose connection to each other. The "related companies" group is not needed and has consistently been increased to overpower the other information contained in the template. Therefore, I think the "related companies" group should be discarded. Does anyone disagree?  Chickenmonkey  21:48, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Coloring of the template[edit]

There have been a couple of recent edits adding "darkorange" coloring to this template. I contend that this is a gratuitous use of coloring, and is entirely unwarranted. As such, it goes against current Wikipedia policy on color use. Perhaps a discussion on this issue can be had here, instead of pursuing an edit-war.  Chickenmonkey  23:05, 28 June 2010 (UTC)