Template talk:Universal Press Syndicate

Is this template really necessary? Why isn't a category enough?--SidP 23:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty ugly too --Rubber cat 06:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I find it easier to navigate around with it, but it could use a little cleaning up. --iguana_nirvana14 17:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could we do away with the redlinks? As a navigation box, it's pretty pointless to include links to artlcles that don't exist yet. --Brandon Dilbeck 16:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ugly template[edit]

Could the font be set to a normal size? 75.62.7.22 08:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought I agree with those who suggest using a category instead. This template is too big even if the fonts are fixed. 75.62.7.22 08:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for deletion[edit]

I've nominated this template for deletion: Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Universal_Press_Syndicate 75.62.7.22 06:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]