A tetraneutron is a hypothetical stable cluster of four neutrons. The existence of this cluster of particles is not supported by current models of nuclear forces. There is some empirical evidence suggesting that this particle does exist, based on a 2001 experiment by Francisco-Miguel Marqués and co-workers at the Ganil accelerator in Caen using a novel detection method in observations of the disintegration of beryllium and lithium nuclei. However, subsequent attempts to replicate this observation have failed.
As with many particle accelerator experiments, Marques' team fired atomic nuclei at carbon targets and observed the "spray" of particles from the resulting collisions. In this case the experiment involved firing beryllium-14, beryllium-15 and lithium-11 nuclei at a small carbon target, the most successful being beryllium-14. This isotope of beryllium has a nuclear halo that consists of four clustered neutrons; this allows it to be easily separated intact in the high-speed collision with the carbon target. Current nuclear models suggest that four separate neutrons should result when beryllium-10 is produced, but the single signal detected in the production of beryllium-10 suggested a multineutron cluster in the breakup products; most likely a beryllium-10 nucleus and four neutrons fused together into a tetraneutron.
Since Marqués' experiment
A later analysis of the detection method used in the Marques' experiment suggested that at least part of the original analysis was flawed, and attempts to reproduce these observations with different methods have not successfully detected any neutron clusters. If, however, the existence of stable tetraneutrons were ever independently confirmed, considerable adjustments would have to be made to current nuclear models. Bertulani and Zelevinsky proposed that, if it existed, the tetraneutron could be formed by a bound state of two dineutron systems. However, attempts to model interactions that might give rise to multineutron clusters have failed, and it "does not seem possible to change modern nuclear Hamiltonians to bind a tetraneutron without destroying many other successful predictions of those Hamiltonians. This means that, should a recent experimental claim of a bound tetraneutron be confirmed, our understanding of nuclear forces will have to be significantly changed."
In 2016 researchers at RIKEN in Wako, Japan observed evidence that the tetraneutron exists briefly as a resonance. They fired a beam of neutron-rich helium-8 nuclei (two protons and six neutrons) at a liquid target composed of helium-4 (two protons and two neutrons). Occasionally, the reaction produced beryllium-8 nuclei with four protons and four neutrons, leaving four neutrons unaccounted for. If a four-neutron nucleus did occur, it lasted for about 10−21 seconds before decaying into other particles.
In 2021, however, a team at the Technical University of Munich bombarded a lithium-7 target with lithium-7 and found preliminary evidence of a bound state of four neutrons, with an estimated lifetime of several minutes, similar to that of a free neutron.
- Cierjacks, S.; et al. (1965). "Further Evidence for the Nonexistence of Particle-Stable Tetraneutrons". Physical Review. 137 (2B): 345–346. Bibcode:1965PhRv..137..345C. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.137.B345.
- Marqués, F. M.; et al. (2002). "Detection of neutron clusters". Physical Review C. 65 (4): 044006. arXiv:nucl-ex/0111001. Bibcode:2002PhRvC..65d4006M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.65.044006.
- Ivanytskyi, Perez-Garcia & Albertus (2019). "Tetraneutron condensation in neutron rich matter". TBA. TBA (TBA): TBA. arXiv:nucl-th/0011512.
- Sherrill, B. M.; Bertulani, C. A (2004). "Proton-tetraneutron elastic scattering". Physical Review C. 69 (2): 027601. arXiv:nucl-th/0312110. Bibcode:2004PhRvC..69b7601S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.027601.
- Aleksandrov, D. V.; et al. (2005). "Search for Resonances in the Three- and Four-Neutron Systems in the 7Li (7Li, 11C) 3n and 7Li (7Li, 10C) 4n Reactions". JETP Letters. 81 (2): 43–46. Bibcode:2005JETPL..81...43A. doi:10.1134/1.1887912.
- Bertulani, C. A.; Zelevinsky, V. G. (2003). "Tetraneutron as a dineutron-dineutron molecule". Journal of Physics G. 29 (10): 2431–2437. arXiv:nucl-th/0212060. Bibcode:2003JPhG...29.2431B. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/29/10/309.
- Lazauskas, R.; Carbonell, J. (2005). "Three-neutron resonance trajectories for realistic interaction models". Physical Review C. 71 (4): 044004. arXiv:nucl-th/0502037v2. Bibcode:2005PhRvC..71d4004L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.044004.
- Arai, K. (2003). "Resonance states of 5H and 5Be in a microscopic three-cluster model". Physical Review C. 68 (3): 034303. Bibcode:2003PhRvC..68c4303A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.68.034303.
- Hemmdan, A.; Glöckle, W.; Kamada, H. (2002). "Indications for the nonexistence of three-neutron resonances near the physical region". Physical Review C. 66 (3): 054001. arXiv:nucl-th/0208007. Bibcode:2002PhRvC..66e4001H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.66.054001.
- Pieper, S. C. (2003). "Can Modern Nuclear Hamiltonians Tolerate a Bound Tetraneutron?". Physical Review Letters. 90 (25): 252501. arXiv:nucl-th/0302048. Bibcode:2003PhRvL..90y2501P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.252501. PMID 12857127.
- "Physicists find signs of four-neutron nucleus". Science News. Retrieved 2016-02-08.
- Bertulani, Carlos A.; Zelevinsky, Vladimir (2016). "Four neutrons together momentarily". Nature. 532 (7600): 448–449. Bibcode:2016Natur.532..448B. doi:10.1038/nature17884. PMID 27049938.
- "Tetra-Neutron Experiment: Understanding of Nuclear Forces Might Have To Be Significantly Changed". SciTech Daily. December 12, 2021. Retrieved December 13, 2021.
- Faestermann, Thomas; Bergmaier, Andreas; Gernhäuser, Roman; Koll, Dominik; Mahgoub, Mahmoud (January 2022). "Indications for a bound tetraneutron". Physics Letters B. 824: 136799. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136799. ISSN 0370-2693.
|last3=has generic name (help)