Thomae's function, named after Carl Johannes Thomae, has many names: the popcorn function, the raindrop function, the countable cloud function, the modified Dirichlet function, the ruler function,[1] the Riemann function, or the Stars over Babylon (John Horton Conway's name).[2] This real-valued functionf(x) of the real variable x is defined as:[3]
Since every rational number has a unique representation with relatively prime and , the function is well-defined. Note that is the only number in which is coprime to
It is a modification of the Dirichlet function, which is 1 at rational numbers and 0 elsewhere.
Properties
Thomae's function is bounded and maps all real numbers to the unit interval:
is periodic with period for all integer n and all real x.
Proof of periodicity
For all since
For all there exist and such that and
According to Bézout's identity, for some holds
and thus
is discontinuous at all rational numbers, dense within the real numbers.
Proof of discontinuity at rational numbers
Assume an arbitrary rational with and coprime.
This establishes
Let be any irrational number and define for all
These are all irrational, and so
This implies and
Taking and selects an such that
and
for all
which is exactly the definition of discontinuity of at .
This shows that is discontinuous on
is continuous at all irrational numbers, also dense within the real numbers.
Proof of continuity at irrational arguments
Since is periodic with period and it suffices to check all irrational points in Assume now and According to the Archimedean property of the reals, there exists with and there exist such that
for
The minimal distance of to its i-th lower and upper bounds equals
We define as the minimum of all the finitely many
so that
for all and
This is to say, that all these rational numbers are outside the -neighborhood of
Now let with the unique representation where are coprime. Then, necessarily, and therefore,
Likewise, for all irrational and thus, if then any choice of (sufficiently small) gives
Therefore, is continuous on
is nowhere differentiable.
Proof of being nowhere differentiable
For rational numbers, this follows from non-continuity.
For irrational numbers:
All sequences of irrational numbers converging to the irrational point imply a constant sequence identical to and so
According to Hurwitz's theorem, there also exists a sequence of rational numbers converging to with coprime and
Thus for all and so is not differentiable at all irrational
See the proofs for continuity and discontinuity above for the construction of appropriate neighbourhoods, where has maxima.
is Riemann integrable on any interval and the integral evaluates to over any set.
The Lebesgue criterion for integrability states that a bounded function is Riemann integrable if and only if the set of all discontinuities has measure zero.[4] Every countable subset of the real numbers - such as the rational numbers - has measure zero, so the above discussion shows that Thomae's function is Riemann integrable on any interval. The function's integral is equal to over any set because the function is equal to zero almost everywhere.
Follow-up
A natural follow-up question one might ask is if there is a function which is continuous on the rational numbers and discontinuous on the irrational numbers. This turns out to be impossible; the set of discontinuities of any function must be an Fσ set. If such a function existed, then the irrationals would be an Fσ set. The irrationals would then be the countable union of closed sets , but since the irrationals do not contain an interval, nor can any of the . Therefore, each of the would be nowhere dense, and the irrationals would be a meager set. It would follow that the real numbers, being a union of the irrationals and the rationals (which is evidently meager), would also be a meager set. This would contradict the Baire category theorem: because the reals form a complete metric space, they form a Baire space, which cannot be meager in itself.
A variant of Thomae's function can be used to show that any Fσ subset of the real numbers can be the set of discontinuities of a function. If is a countable union of closed sets , define
Then a similar argument as for Thomae's function shows that has A as its set of discontinuities.
Empirical probability distributions related to Thomae's function appear in DNA sequencing.[5] The human genome is diploid, having two strands per chromosome. When sequenced, small pieces ("reads") are generated: for each spot on the genome, an integer number of reads overlap with it. Their ratio is a rational number, and typically distributed similarly to Thomae's function.
If pairs of positive integers are sampled from a distribution and used to generate ratios , this gives rise to a distribution on the rational numbers. If the integers are independent the distribution can be viewed as a convolution over the rational numbers, . Closed form solutions exist for power-law distributions with a cut-off. If (where is the polylogarithm function) then . In the case of uniform distributions on the set , which is very similar to Thomae's function. Both their graphs have fractal dimension 3/2.[5]
The ruler function
For integers, the exponent of the highest power of 2 dividing gives 0, 1, 0, 2, 0, 1, 0, 3, 0, 1, 0, 2, 0, 1, 0, ... (sequence A007814 in the OEIS). If 1 is added, or if the 0's are removed, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, ... (sequence A001511 in the OEIS). The values resemble tick-marks on a 1/16th graduated ruler, hence the name. These values correspond to the restriction of the Thomae function to those rational numbers whose denominators are powers of 2.
Euclid's orchard – Thomae's function can be interpreted as a perspective drawing of Euclid's orchard
Notes
^"…the so-called ruler function, a simple but provocative example that appeared in a work of Johannes Karl Thomae … The graph suggests the vertical markings on a ruler—hence the name." (Dunham 2008, p. 149, chapter 10)
Abbott, Stephen (2016), Understanding Analysis (Softcover reprint of the original 2nd ed.), New York: Springer, ISBN978-1-4939-5026-3
Bartle, Robert G.; Sherbert, Donald R. (1999), Introduction to Real Analysis (3rd ed.), Wiley, ISBN978-0-471-32148-4 (Example 5.1.6 (h))
Beanland, Kevin; Roberts, James W.; Stevenson, Craig (2009), "Modifications of Thomae's Function and Differentiability", The American Mathematical Monthly, 116 (6): 531–535, JSTOR40391145