Tribute: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 20:19, 2 October 2010

"Nay, we are but men. ROCK"

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+"Nay, we are but men. ROCK"
-{{Otheruses}}
-{{Expand|date=November 2007}}
-[[Image:Russian prince takes tribute by Roerich.jpg|thumb|300px|''[[Poliudie]]'', by [[Nicholas Roerich]], 1908 (Moscow).]]
-[[Image:13 bactrians.jpg|thumb||[[Bactria]]ns carrying tribute, [[Persepolis]]]]
-A '''tribute''' (from [[Latin]] ''tributum'', contribution) is wealth one party gives to another as a sign of respect or, as was often the case in historical contexts, of submission or allegiance. It also incorporated certain aspects of regulated trade in goods and services between the parties under a contractual relationship formed upon [[duress]], and based upon the potential for threats if [[specific performance]] did not occur. A '''tributary''' or [[tributary state]] is a state, colony, region, or people who pay tribute to a more powerful, [[suzerain]] [[Sovereign state|state]].
-Various ancient states, which could be called suzerains, exacted tribute from areas they had conquered or threatened to conquer. In case of [[Military alliance|alliance]]s, lesser parties gave tribute to the dominant parties as a sign of allegiance and for the purposes of financing the agreed projects - usually raising an [[army]]. The term may also be used on religious [[tax]] used for maintenance of [[temple]]s and other sacred places.
-[[Athens]] received tribute from the other cities of the [[Delian League]]. Empires of [[Assyria]], [[Babylon]], [[Carthage]] and [[Rome]] exacted tribute from their [[province]]s and subject kingdoms. Ancient [[China]] received tribute from various states such as [[Japan]], [[Korea]], [[Vietnam]], Cambodia, Borneo, Indonesia, South Asia and Central Asia.<ref name="Lockard 2007">{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=yJPlCpzOY_QC&pg=PA315&dq=tribute&hl=en#v=onepage&q=tribute&f=false|page=315|title=Societies, Networks, and Transitions: A Global History: To 1500|first= Craig A. |last=Lockard |publisher= Cengage Learning|year= 2007 |isbn=0618386122|page=315}}</ref> [[Roman republic]] also exacted tribute in the form of equivalent to proportional [[property tax]]es for the purpose of waging [[war]].
-==Chinese practice of tributes as trade regulation and authority==
-{{seealso|List of tributaries of Imperial China}}
-In [[China]], the [[List of tributaries of Imperial China|tribute system]] began from ancient China period to provide both an administrative means to control their interests, as well as a means of providing exclusive trading priorities to those who paid tribute from foreign regions.It was an integral part of the [[Confucian]] [[philosophy]] and was seen by the Chinese as equivalent to the familial relation of younger sons looking after older parents by devoting part of their wealth, assets, or goods to that purpose. Political marriages also existed between the Chinese empire and tribute states, such as [[Songtsen Gampo]] and Wencheng (Gyasa).
-China often received tribute from the states under the influence of [[Confucian]] [[civilization]] and gave them Chinese products and recognition of their authority and sovereignty in return. There were several tribute states to the Chinese-established empires throughout ancient history, including neighboring countries such as Japan, Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Borneo, Indonesia, South Asia and Central Asia.<ref name="Lockard 2007"/> This tributary system and relationship are well known as [[Jimi System|Jimi]] (羁縻) or [[Cefeng]] (册封), or [[Chaogong]] (朝貢). In Japanese, the tributary system and relationship is referred to as [[Shinkou]] (進貢), [[Sakuhou]] (冊封) and [[Choukou]] (朝貢).
-According to the Chinese [[Book of Han]], the various tribes of [[Japan]] (constituting the nation of [[Wa]]) had already entered into tributary relationships with China by the first century <ref>後漢書, ''會稽海外有東鯷人 分爲二十餘國''</ref>. However, Japan ceased to present tribute to China and left the tributary system during the [[Heian]] period without damaging economic ties. Although Japan eventually returned to the tributary system during the [[Muromachi]] period, it did not recommence presenting tribute.<ref>{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/?id=97LTcTx8N98C&pg=PA40&dq=Japan+Wei+tribute&q=Japan%20Wei%20tribute |work=The Chinese Tribute System and Japan |title=The foundations of Japan's modernization: a comparison with China's path towards modernization |pages=40–41 |author=Yoda, Yoshiie |coauthors=|Radtke, Kurt Werner |publisher=Brill Publishers |year=1996 |isbn=9004099999 |quote=King Na was awarded the seal of the Monarch of the Kingdom of Wa during the Chinese Han Dynasty, and Queen Himiko, who had sent a tribute mission to the Wei Dynasty (third century), was followed by the five kings of Wa who also offered to the Wei. This evidence points to the fact that at this period Japan was inside the Chinese tribute system. Japanese missions to the Sui (581-604) and Tang Dynasties were recognized by the Chinese as bearers of imperial tribute;however in the middle of ninth century - the early Heian period - Japan rescinded the sending missions to the Tang Empire.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.chinajapan.org/articles/15/mizuno15.108-144.pdf |work= |title=China in Tokugawa Foreign Relations: The Tokugawa Bakufu’s Perception of and Attitudes toward Ming-Qing China |pages=109 |author=Mizuno Norihito |publisher=Ohio State University |year=2003 |quote=It was not that Japan, as China’s neighbor, had had nothing to do with or been indifferent to hierarchical international relations when seeking relationships with China or the constituents of the Chinese world order. It had sporadically paid tribute to Chinese dynasties in ancient and medieval times but had usually not been a regular vassal state of China. It had obviously been one of the countries most reluctant to participate in the Sinocentric world order. Japan did not identify itself as a vassal state of China during most of its history, no matter how China saw it.}}</ref>
-According to the Korean historical document ''[[Samguk Sagi]]'' (삼국사기, 三國史記), [[Goguryeo]] sent a diplomatic representative to the Han Dynasty in 32 AD, and the [[Emperor Guangwu of Han]] granted the official rank of [[Goguryeo]]. <ref>≪삼국사기≫에 의하면 32년(고구려 대무신왕 15)에 후한으로 사신을 보내어 조공을 바치니 후한의 광무제(光武帝)가 왕호를 회복시켜주었다는 기록이 있다 («Tang» 32 years, according to (Goguryeo Daemusin 15) sent ambassadors to the generous tribute to the Emperor Guangwu of Han Emperor in abundance (光武帝) gave evidence that can restore wanghoreul -- Google translation?)</ref>
-The tributary relationship between Korea and China was established during the [[Three Kingdoms of Korea]].<ref name="Pratt, Rutt & Hoare 1999">{{cite book|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=vj8ShHzUxrYC&pg=PA482&dq=tribute+korea+china&hl=en#v=onepage&q=tribute%20korea%20china&f=false|title=Korea: a historical and cultural dictionary|first1= Keith L. |last1=Pratt|first2= Richard|last2= Rutt|first3= James|last3= Hoare |publisher=Routledge|year= 1999 |isbn= 0700704639|page=482}}</ref><ref>Kwak, Tae-Hwan ''et al.'' (2003). {{Google books|yIVXMjmKqHkC|''The Korean peace process and the four powers,'' p. 99.|page=99}}; excerpt, "Korea's tributary relations with China began as early as the fifth century, were regularized during the Goryeo dynasty (918-1392), and became fully institutionalized during the Yi dynasty (1392-1910)."</ref> This continued until China's defeat in the [[First Sino-Japanese War|Sino-Japanese War]] of 1894-1895.<ref name="Pratt, Rutt & Hoare 1999"/><ref>Kwak, {{Google books|yIVXMjmKqHkC|p. 100.|page=100}}; excerpt, "The tributary relations between China and Korea came to an end when China was defeated in the Sino-Japanese war of 1894-1895;"</ref><ref>Lane, Roger. (2008). {{Google books|IvqVxwpDK2UC|''Encyclopedia Small Silver Coins,'' p. 331.|page=331}}</ref>
-There is a clear differentiation between the term "tribute" and "gift." The former, known as ''gong'', has important connotations. The [[Emperor of China|Chinese emperors]] made sure that the gifts they paid to other states were known as mere gifts, not tributes. Even at times when a [[Chinese dynasty]] had to bribe nomads from raiding their border such as in the [[Han Dynasty]] and the [[Song Dynasty]], the emperors gave "gifts" to the [[Xiongnu]] and the [[Khitan people|Khitan]]. The only time when a dynasty paid formal tribute to another was during the southern [[Song dynasty]], where tribute was given to the [[Jin Dynasty, 1115–1234|Jin Dynasty]] for peace. The Jin Dynasty also saw itself as the legitimate holder of the "Mandate of Heaven".
-In addition, the [[Zheng He]] expeditions also carried goods to build tribute relationships between the [[Ming Dynasty]] and newly discovered kingdoms. Tribute activities occupy several chapters in the [[Twenty-Four Histories]].
-==Islamic notions of tribute==
-{{see also|Jizya}}
-The Islamic [[Caliphate]] introduced a new form of tribute, known as the '[[jizya]]', that differed significantly from earlier Roman forms of tribute. According to Patricia Seed:
-{{quote|What distinguished jizya historically from the Roman form of tribute is that it was exclusively a tax on persons, and on adult men. Roman "tribute" was sometimes a form of borrowing as well as a tax. It could be levied on land, landowners, and slaveholders, as well as on people. Even when assessed on individuals, the amount was often determined by the value of the group's assets and did not depend—as did Islamic jizya—upon actual head counts of men of fighting age. Christian Iberian rulers would later adopt similar taxes during their reconquest of the peninsula.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Ceremonies of Possession in Europe's Conquest of the New World, 1492-1640|first=Patricia|last=Seed|year=1995|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|isbn=0521497574|page=80}}</ref>}}
-Christians of the [[Iberian Peninsula]] translated the term 'jizya' as ''tributo''. This form of tribute was later also applied by the [[Spanish Empire|Spanish]] and [[Portuguese Empire|Portuguese]] empires to their territories in the [[New World]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=Ceremonies of Possession in Europe's Conquest of the New World, 1492-1640|first=Patricia|last=Seed|year=1995|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=0521497574|pages=80–1}}</ref>
-==Western European notions of tribute in medieval times==
-[[Raid (military)|Raid]]ers, like [[Vikings]] and [[Celt]]ic tribes, could also exact tribute instead of raiding the place if the potential targets agreed to pay an agreed amount of valuables.
-Tribute was not always money, but also valuables, effectively making the payers [[hostage]]s kept unpillaged in exchange for good behavior.
-Various medieval lords required tribute from their [[vassal]]s or [[peasants]], nominally in exchange for protection to incur the costs of raising armies, or paying for free-lance mercenaries against a hostile neighbouring state. That system evolved into medieval [[taxation]] and co-existed as a secular approximation of the churchly [[tithe]] upon income.
-During the Spanish [[Reconquista]], there were period when the Christian kings were more militarily powerful than the [[Moors]], but lacked the population to settle and defend the conquered territories.
-They were contented with receiving tribute, the [[parias]].
-Combined with commerce across the Mediterranean, it was a means for African wares like gold to enter Europe.
-==Tribute in the modern era==
-Modern elements of tribute are restricted to highly formal and ceremonial rituals: such as formal gifts being given to prove either fealty or loyalty upon the inauguration of a president, a wedding of a president's children while in office; the accession of a member of a royal family, or their marriages; and even in the largely staged show business marriages, where studios, banks, and other stars prove their loyalty through expensive gifts in hope of future benefits, and if are not given will result in loss of business. Thus, the element of duress and coercion seen in earlier times is part of this process, particularly in Hollywood.{{Citation needed|date=June 2007}}
-<!--also to be allowed influence in the sphere of operation or nation concerned a gratuity can, if accepted, be given as tribute.--Lost sentence fragment? ~~~~-->
-In general use, the phrase, "'''to pay tribute'''," often means, "to praise or laud," whether or not an accompanying gift (the historical understanding of "tribute") is provided.
-==Notes==
-{{reflist}}
-==References==
-* Kwak, Tae-Hwan and Seung-Ho Joo. (2003). [http://books.google.com/books?id=yIVXMjmKqHkC&printsec=frontcover&dq=The+Korean+Peace+process+and+the+Four+powers&hl=en&ei=G6SSTNK2CoK88gbZjr2pBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false  ''The Korean Peace process and the Four powers.''] Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate.  10-ISBN 0754636534/13-ISBN 9780754636533; [http://www.worldcat.org/title/korean-peace-process-and-the-four-powers/oclc/156055048  OCLC 156055048]
-* [[Keith Pratt|Pratt, Keith L.]], [[Richard Rutt]] and [[James Hoare]]. (1999). [http://books.google.com/books?id=e7pyBEWioLsC&dq=Korea+:+a+historical+and+cultural+dictionary&hl=en&ei=5aKSTPX1GIK78galyJm-Bg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA  ''Korea: a Historical and Cultural Dictionary.''] Richmond: Curzon Press. 10-ISBN 0700704639/13-ISBN 9780700704637; 10-ISBN 0700704647; 13-ISBN 9780700704644; [http://www.worldcat.org/title/korea-a-historical-and-cultural-dictionary/oclc/245844259  OCLC 245844259]
-==See also==
-* [[Danegeld]]
-* [[List of recipients of tribute from China]]
-* [[List of tributaries of Imperial China]]
-{{wiktionary|tribute}}
-[[Category:International relations]]
-[[bg:Трибут]]
-[[ca:Tribut]]
-[[cs:Tribut]]
-[[de:Tribut]]
-[[es:Tributo]]
-[[eu:Tributu]]
-[[fr:Tribut]]
-[[gl:Tributo]]
-[[ko:조공]]
-[[id:Upeti]]
-[[it:Tributo]]
-[[lt:Duoklė]]
-[[ja:朝貢]]
-[[no:Tributt]]
-[[pl:Trybut]]
-[[pt:Tributo]]
-[[ru:Дань]]
-[[simple:Tribute]]
-[[sv:Tribut]]
-[[uk:Данина]]
-[[zh:朝贡体系]]