Jump to content

Chamfered dodecahedron

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tartalacitrouille (talk | contribs) at 23:21, 19 February 2009 (External links). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Truncated rhombic triacontahedron
Truncated rhombic triacontahedron
Type Conway polyhedron
Faces 12 pentagons
30 hexagons
Edges 120 (2 types)
Vertices 80 (2 types)
Vertex configuration (60) 5.6.6
(20) 6.6.6
Symmetry group Icosahedral (Ih)
Dual polyhedron -
Properties convex, equilateral-faced
A net for truncated rhombic triacontahedron

The truncated rhombic triacontahedron is a convex polyhedron constructed from the rhombic triacontahedron by truncating the twelve vertices where five faces meet at their acute corners.

The 12 vertices can be truncated such that all edges are equal length. The original 30 rhombic faces become non-regular hexagons, and the truncated vertices become regular pentagons.

The hexagon faces can be equilateral but not regular with D2 symmetry. The angles at the two vertices with vertex configuration 6.6.6 are arccos(-1/sqrt(5)) = 116.565 degrees, and at the remaining four vertices with 5.6.6, they are 121.717 degrees each.

This polyhedron looks very similar to the uniform truncated icosahedron which has 12 pentagons, but only 20 hexagons.

Note that this name is ambiguous since only 12 vertices were truncated, and different polyhedra can be generated by truncating the other 20 vertices, or all 32 vertices of the original rhombic triacontahedron.

Chemistry

This is the shape of the fullerene C80; sometimes this shape is denoted C80(Ih) to describe its icosahedral symmetry and distinguish it from other less-symmetric 80-vertex fullerenes. It is one of only four fullerenes found by Deza, Deza & Grishukhin (1998) to have a skeleton that can be isometrically embeddable into an L1 space.

References

  • Deza, A.; Deza, M.; Grishukhin, V. (1998), "Fullerenes and coordination polyhedra versus half-cube embeddings", Discrete Mathematics, 192 (1): 41–80, doi:10.1016/S0012-365X(98)00065-X.

See also