Jump to content

User:42corndogs/Intersectionality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:42corndogs/Intersectionality

Article Draft

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

Article

[edit]

Writing programs on race and gender

[edit]

Inclusion of intersectionality is meant to "Trouble the Boundaries" and pave the way for a more diverse writing program in Predominantly White Institutions (PWI). Writing programs are very closely linked by the influence of race and gender. Both of the authors Collin Lamout Craig and Staci Maree write about their experiences in writing program's as administrators in a predominantly white midwestern institution. One big culture shock to them was the underrepresentation of people of color and minorities in the Council of Writing Program Administrators (CWPA) meetings. The CWPA oversee the evolution of the program, introduce revisions, implement university writing standards etc. Therefore, reprogramming and the addressing of issues must first and foremost go through the CWPA.[1] That is not to say any of the council members are at fault, it is a mere observation to shed light on the issue at hand, power dynamics and how they affect writing programs.[1] Dominant and minority relationships serve as a dimension that pushes for change in order to reach common language. Consequently, a broader composition in understanding helps construct identity politics in order to reach an agreement.[1] Craig then goes on to share her story when a well known professor approaches her and takes on an "It's not my problem"[1] or "I can't teach these people"[1] attitude when he has an issue with another black RA. The professor then goes on to say "He might take constructive criticism better from a pretty woman like you than an old white guy like me."[1] Her example is one of many given in the article that address the issue at hand with power dynamics within writing programs and PWI's.  It doesn't allow room for advice or consultation from those of other races or gender. Instead, it simply passes on one problem from one demographic to another.[1] In these cases taking into consideration intersectionality and how prevalent they are in academia can help set up a system of acknowledgment and understanding.

Psychology

[edit]

Researchers in psychology have incorporated intersection effects since the 1950.[2] These intersection effects were based on studying the lenses of biases, heuristics, stereotypes, and judgments. Psychologists have extended research in psychological biases to the areas of cognitive and motivational psychology. What is found, is that every human mind has its own biases in judgment and decision-making that tend to preserve the status quo by avoiding change and attention to ideas that exist outside one's personal realm of perception.[2] Psychological interaction effects span a range of variables, although person-by-situation effects are the most examined category. As a result, psychologists do not construe the interaction effect of demographics such as gender and race as either more noteworthy or less noteworthy than any other interaction effect. In addition, oppression can be regarded as a subjective construct when viewed as an absolute hierarchy.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g Craig, C.L. and Perryman-Clark, S.M. (2011) ‘Troubling the Boundaries: (De)Constructing WPA Identities at the Intersections of Race and Gender’, WPA: Writing Program Administration - Journal of the Council of Writing Program Administrators, 34(2), pp. 37–58. http://associationdatabase.co/archives/34n2/34n2craig-perryman-clark.pdf. S2CID 157223989
  2. ^ a b Samuelson, William; Zeckhauser, Richard (1988-03). "Status quo bias in decision making". Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1 (1): 7–59. doi:10.1007/BF00055564. ISSN 0895-5646. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)