User:A.Evanzz/Environmental communication

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article Draft[edit]

Limitations[edit]

When it comes to the increased polarization of movements regarding the environment some people point to the impact of identity campaigns because of the argument that fear is counterproductive. Robert Brulle argues this point and calls for a shift away from these identity campaigns and moving towards challenge campaigns. [1]

applied activist theory[edit]

While there are some findings that there is a problem with scientists advocating for certain positions in a study conducted by John Kotcher and others it was found that there was no real difference between the credibility of scientists regardless of their advocacy unless they directly tried to argue in favor a specific solution to the problem.[2]

Limitations[edit]

Another limitation of the conversation regarding the environment is the fact that there are multiple agendas being set by different groups in China and the fact that they are different from one another. Along with this the idea that these two different groups are in some sort of a discussion is presented by Xiaohui Wang et. al.[3]

Limitations[edit]

Along with the aforementioned limitations the media plays a major role in the conversation around the environment because of the framing effect and the impact that it has on the overall perception of the environment and the discussion surrounding it.[4]

Limitations[edit]

Echo chambers are very similar to the idea of confirmation and are discussed by Christel van Eck who says with respect to environmental communication that echo chambers can reinforce preexisting climate change perceptions.[5]

Limitations[edit]

Framing is something that has been important to many movements in the past but it is more than just creating slogans and the like. George Lakoff argues in favor of a social movement approach similar to the feminist movement or the civil rights movement. [6]

Limitations[edit]

Another reason that it can be difficult to communicate about these things is that many people try to use directional motivated reasoning in which they try to find evidence to push a specific narrative on the topic. The effect that this has had on communicating this idea is examined by Robin Bayes and others who say that it can be very detrimental and divisive.[7]

Applied Activist Theory[edit]

This idea that it can be damaging to a scientists reputation to offer up opinions or solutions to the problem of Climate Change has been furthered by research done by Doug Cloud who had findings affirming this idea.[8]

Limitations[edit]

A culture centered approach has been suggested by some like Debashish Munshi. These people argue for enacting change based on the knowledge of older cultures however it has to exist in a way that does not abuse the relationship between the older cultures and our current one which according to Munshi makes it very difficult to enact.[9]

Limitations

One of the things that makes environmental narratives so dangerous is that it changes so often that it is very difficult to keep the information the same as it travels. This according to Miyase Christensen makes it so that the spreading of these narratives can be dangerous.[10]

Article body[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ login.collegeofidaho.idm.oclc.org. doi:10.1080/17524030903522397 https://login.collegeofidaho.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.tandfonline.com%2fdoi%2ffull%2f10.1080%2f17524030903522397. Retrieved 2023-04-26. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  2. ^ login.collegeofidaho.idm.oclc.org. doi:10.1080/17524032.2016.1275736 https://login.collegeofidaho.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.tandfonline.com%2fdoi%2ffull%2f10.1080%2f17524032.2016.1275736. Retrieved 2023-04-26. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  3. ^ login.collegeofidaho.idm.oclc.org. doi:10.1080/17524032.2021.1901760 https://login.collegeofidaho.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.tandfonline.com%2fdoi%2ffull%2f10.1080%2f17524032.2021.1901760. Retrieved 2023-04-26. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  4. ^ login.collegeofidaho.idm.oclc.org. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1787479 https://login.collegeofidaho.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.tandfonline.com%2fdoi%2ffull%2f10.1080%2f17524032.2020.1787479. Retrieved 2023-04-26. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  5. ^ login.collegeofidaho.idm.oclc.org. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1861048 https://login.collegeofidaho.idm.oclc.org/login?qurl=https://www.tandfonline.com%2fdoi%2ffull%2f10.1080%2f17524032.2020.1861048. Retrieved 2023-04-26. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  6. ^ Lakoff, George (2010-03). "Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment". Environmental Communication. 4 (1): 70–81. doi:10.1080/17524030903529749. ISSN 1752-4032. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  7. ^ Bayes, Robin; Bolsen, Toby; Druckman, James N. (2023-01-02). "A Research Agenda for Climate Change Communication and Public Opinion: The Role of Scientific Consensus Messaging and Beyond". Environmental Communication. 17 (1): 16–34. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1805343. ISSN 1752-4032.
  8. ^ Cloud, Doug (2020-08-17). "The Corrupted Scientist Archetype and Its Implications for Climate Change Communication and Public Perceptions of Science". Environmental Communication. 14 (6): 816–829. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1741420. ISSN 1752-4032.
  9. ^ Munshi, Debashish; Kurian, Priya; Cretney, Raven; Morrison, Sandra L.; Kathlene, Lyn (2020-07-03). "Centering Culture in Public Engagement on Climate Change". Environmental Communication. 14 (5): 573–581. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1746680. ISSN 1752-4032.
  10. ^ Christensen, Miyase; Åberg, Anna; Lidström, Susanna; Larsen, Katarina (2018-01-02). "Environmental Themes in Popular Narratives". Environmental Communication. 12 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1421802. ISSN 1752-4032.