User:A3C7/Human polyomavirus 2/Lopcal Peer Review

Peer review

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? A3C7
• Link to draft you're reviewing:A3C7/Human polyomavirus 2

Content

I do agree with you that the article you are improving needs a lot of development and the the two sections you arcading are crucial to further learn about this virus.The content you added about the life cycle of the virus is relevant to the topic and I believe you have done a great job with simplifying the content the way you did. It is understandable and easy to be followed. Overall, you did a great job with the addition of this part to the article.

Tone and Balance

The content you added is neutral since it does not present your position, views or opinions about the topic but rather it was developed using factual information. I found there is no bias presented in the information you wrote and the content you added was relevant throughout with the topic.

Sources and References

The sources you used are reliable, and they are relevant to the topic you are writing about. The only thing is that one of your sources is from 1992 which can be considered a bit outdated but the rest of your sources were current. I checked a few of the links and they opened which is great because for wiki purposes, sources used need to be open access. There is one recommendation I would like to make which is to cite the information within the paragraph also so you can give credit to the sources you go the information from.

Organization

The paragraph you wrote is understandable and the information you have is relevant to the topic. I would recommend to revise the structure of a couple of sentences so that the ideas flow smoother and become more understandable.Overall, the organization of your ideas within the paragraph was good.

Overall impressions

The addition of this part to the article would improve the quality of the overall article since it would make it more complete and fill in the gaps of missing information.

~~~~lopcal