Jump to content

User:AWFarrow/Greene and Greene/Emmitross Peer Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

General info

[edit]
Whose work are you reviewing?

AWfarrow

Link to draft you're reviewing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AWFarrow/Greene_and_Greene?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Greene and Greene

Evaluate the drafted changes

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

The lead is concise and provides a good overview of the article. I do not believe it was necessary to tweak the lead and it was left alone.

Content

[edit]

The added content is very relevant to the article and provides important information about the inspirations of the Greene brothers. There is a small section about dougongs that is not relevant to the article.

Tone and Balance

[edit]

The content added is fair and objective. It is simply factual and does not favor any particular position.

Sources and References

[edit]

The sources are reliable and accurately reflected in the article content.

Organization

[edit]

The content added is organized in a logical fashion and it is easy to read.

Images and Media

[edit]

The student added a well captioned and relevant image that enhances the readers understanding of the article.

Overall Impressions

[edit]

The content added definitely enhances the article and gives the reader a better understanding of the topic. The section on dougongs has some extraneous information not relevant to the Greene brothers. Other than that the additions are very nice.