User:Aarukrish/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article[edit]
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: Phoebe Couzins
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate- A person of interest to me, who is also relevant to the course.
Lead[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?- Yes.
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?-Yes, but could include a bit more.
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?-No.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?-Consise
Lead evaluation[edit]
Content[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic?-yes
- Is the content up-to-date?-Yes
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?-Some missing, such as her contribution to suffrage and anti-suffrage parties.
- Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?-No
Content evaluation[edit]
Tone and Balance[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral?-Yes
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?-No
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?-Yes
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?-No
Tone and balance evaluation[edit]
Sources and References[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?-Yes
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?-Yes
- Are the sources current?-Yes
- Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?-Not very much
- Check a few links. Do they work?-Yes (with one dead link)
Sources and references evaluation[edit]
Organization[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?-Yes
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?-No
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?-Yes
Organization evaluation[edit]
Images and Media[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?-Not fully
- Are images well-captioned?-No
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?-Yes
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?-Yes
Images and media evaluation[edit]
Checking the talk page[edit]
- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?-Only one, asking for more clarity in the writing.
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?-No
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?-No
Talk page evaluation[edit]
Overall impressions[edit]
- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status?-Incomplete
- What are the article's strengths?-Easy to understand format
- How can the article be improved?-Adding detail and more context
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?-Underdeveloped
Overall evaluation[edit]
Optional activity[edit]
- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: