User talk:Acebrock/archive 2

Thank you!

Thanks for the award. So you know, I use WP:CDVF to view the recent changes, and often catch the obvious CSD's (Like nn-bio's and nonsense). Then, I use a javascript tool I wrote that I call ATCSD, which automaticly adds the CSD tag to the page with one click of a button, rather than clicking edit, typing it in, typing an edit summary, and hitting submit. It makes for very fast patroling. Again, thanks, and Cheers! --lightdarkness ^(talk) 20:47, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Your RfA

I think you may want to take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Standards and keep in mind that by and large most editors have standards stricter than what is contained there. I suggest you withdraw and apply again in a month or two. If you withdraw now, no one will think badly of you when you come again for adminship, but if this RfA goes badly or if it is snowballed by an admin, other editors will remember that much more negatively later. JoshuaZ 04:34, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Censorship

A revised version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 11:01, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Request for Adminship

It is my regretful task to inform you that I have closed your request for adminship early as unlikely to achieve consensus. Please do not be discouraged; a number of users have had their first RfA end without consensus, but have been promoted overwhelmingly in a later request. Please continue to make outstanding contributions to Wikipedia, and consider requesting adminship again in the future. You may find Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship helpful in deciding when to consider running again. If I can be of any help to you, please do not hesitate to ask. Essjay ^{Talk • Contact} 05:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)