Jump to content

User:Anandhu Rejikumar/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Visual crowding

[edit]
Figure 1: Crowding makes a target that is easily recognizable in isolation, unrecognizable in clutter. When looking directly at the ‘+’ the letter ‘N’ presented in the right is more easily recognized than the N in the clutter ‘KND’

Crowding is the inability to view a target stimulus distinctly when presented in a clutter (Figure 1). Crowding impairs the ability to discriminate object features and contours among flankers, which in turn impairs people’s ability to respond appropriately to the target stimulus[1].

The field of crowding has developed over recent years. This has helped to form an operational definition about crowding thus explaining what crowding is and how it is different from similar effects such as masking, lateral interaction and surround suppression; effects that make the target more challenging to see as well.

There are different criteria used to differentiate crowding from these effects. Firstly, crowding makes it difficult to identify an object but not detecting it among the clutter[2][3][4].Crowded objects are collectively perceived to have high contrast, but they remain indistinct. The eccentricity of the target and the distance between the target and flankers influence crowding. As the distance between the target and the flankers' increases at a given eccentricity the ability to detect the target also improves as the eccentricity of a target is increased the more it pops out from the flankers and the more easily it is identified[5].

Crowding is anisotropic, which means it has different values when measured in different directions. Radially positioned flankers make it harder to identify the target than tangentially positioned ones[6].crowding is stronger in the upper field of the four quadrants than the lower ones[7].A recent study tells us that crowding is intense where the distractor and the target are in the same visual field than when they are in separate visual fields despite equal retinal distance[8].Crowding is also asymmetrical meaning that a single flanker at an eccentric locus higher than the target makes it harder to identify the target than the single flanker at an eccentric locus closer to the fovea[5].Crowding is not just a spatial phenomenon it happens over time as well, when a target is moving it is found to be more crowded when the flankers are leading than when they follow the target[9].


Information that survive crowding

[edit]

There is much information that gets through to peoples conscious even under the circumstances of crowding these include the appearance of a feature, people can easily perceive the appearance of a feature but cannot identify or discriminate the changes in this feature[2][3][4][10].Secondly, After effects from adaptation survive crowding, adapting to a target in a crowded stimulus can help people form an orientation[8] and track the motion of the target[11][12].Next is combined orientation, even though people are not able to tell the individual orientation of a target stimulus in a crowded setting, they can reliably report an average combined orientation of the stimulus, which means that the orientation signals from the target stimulus are combined than lost[13].

Some target identity information survives crowding,people can identify more correct targets from a crowded setting when they are asked to report information on both the target and the flanker. Sometimes certain information such as the target information is lost, but the people are able to make better "target “ responses in this condition. Some information on the target is preserved, but most of the times the location information is lost[14][15][16].

Reduced crowding conditions

[edit]

Crowding is broken when the target and stimulus are different than when they are similar. The difference of target group from the flanker group of stimulus in shape , size[17][18],orientation[3][19][20], polarity[21][17], spatial frequency[22], depth[17], color[17][23][24][25],motion and order[26] breaks crowding.  Crowding happens among faces(holistic crowding) having an inverted face flanker when searching for an upright face breaks crowding. Which makes upright faces more effective flankers[27][28].Providing cue about the target location tends to reduce crowding[29][15][30][31].Crowding is broken when the flankers are collectively masked, but this happens only when the flankers are masked with noise or using metacontrast masks but not with substitution masks[32]. When people are adapted to look for a target stimulus in a certain spatial position, it renders the flankers perceptually invisible (adaptation induced blindness), thus releasing the effect of crowding[33].

Brain and Crowding

[edit]

Neurophysiological studies have not made much progress in narrowing down the locus of the brain at which crowding occurs. Previous researches have demonstrated that crowding is “dichoptical” meaning that the target is perceived by one eye and the distractor by the other[34][35]. Which should mean that the effect of crowding occurs in the cortex. Different researchers have claimed different sites to be the processing center for crowding e.g. ( V1[36], V2 [47], V3[37][38], V4[8][39][40] some researchers claim crowding happens at a later stage of visual processing[11][28]). So, the locus of the brain at which crowding occurs is still not clearly defined.

Models of crowding

[edit]

From the many models that try and explain the process of crowding, there is still a lack of an actual model that helps predict the entirety of how crowding works. All models have three major division that remains as its essence: masking, pooling and substitution. The pooling can be of the low-level features or the pooling of attention. One of the model that nicely predicts is the model by Wilkinson where he boils down the process of crowding to the interaction between complex cells and simple cells, where the simple cells suppress weak complex cell responses and the complex cells respond actively resulted from spatial pooling and then they suppress simple cell activity in their receptive cell area[41].

Another model that best predicts crowding process proposes a quantitative model for a spatial integration of orientation signals, As per the principles of population coding, this model satisfactorily predicts properties like critical spacing, compulsory averaging and the inner and outer asymmetry[18].

Levels of crowding

[edit]

Different studies implicitly assume that crowding is a unitary effect due to a single stage of processing[41][42]. The other notion states that crowding happens independently at several stages of visual processing. This notion supports the view that crowding is influenced by the similarity and configuration of flankers and the target. By this notion, the effect is selectively observed between whole objects[27][28], object parts[43] and features[41]. This view is also consistent with Bouma’s law. This view has gained much support. Crowding in a natural setting may also occur in layers depending on the location, content and attention dependence.

Bouma’s Law

[edit]

Herman Bouma, a Dutch vision researcher and gerontologist stated, “For complete visual isolation of a letter presented at an eccentricity of φ deg, … no other letters should be present within (roughly) 0.5 φ distance[5]”.At a later stage, he reduced the proportionality constant from 0.5 to 0.4[19].This gave rise to the notion of “critical spacing” which is proportional the eccentricity. Critical spacing is the sufficient distance needed for the identification of an object among its flankers in the retinotopically organized cortex. Bouma explains how the effect of crowding is dependent on the eccentricity of a subject and the distance between the flankers and the object. Many studies support the claim that critical space needed for crowding depends on the eccentricity of the subject[2][3][4][44].The proportionality constant named b, after Bouma, is dependent on how similar the flankers are to the target, the number of possible targets, and the arbitrary threshold criterion[45].The value of Boumas proportionality constant ‘b’ is different among studies, but most of the times it is reported to be ≈0.4 - 0.5. This rule is sometimes raised to the status of a 'law' but this remains controversial.


References

[edit]
  1. ^ Whitney, David; Levi, Dennis M. (2011-4). "Visual Crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition". Trends in cognitive sciences. 15 (4): 160–168. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005. ISSN 1364-6613. PMC PMCPMC3070834. PMID 21420894. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. ^ a b c Levi, Dennis M.; Hariharan, Srividhya; Klein, Stanley A. (2002). "Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking". Journal of Vision. 2 (2): 167–177. doi:10.1167/2.2.3. ISSN 1534-7362. PMID 12678590.
  3. ^ a b c d Levi, Dennis M.; Hariharan, Srividhya; Klein, Stanley A. (2002-5). "Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in amblyopic vision". Vision Research. 42 (11): 1379–1394. ISSN 0042-6989. PMID 12044744. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. ^ a b c Pelli, Denis G.; Palomares, Melanie; Majaj, Najib J. (2004-12-30). "Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection". Journal of Vision. 4 (12): 1136–1169. doi:10.1167/4.12.12. ISSN 1534-7362. PMID 15669917.
  5. ^ a b c Bouma, H. (1970-04-11). "Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition". Nature. 226 (5241): 177–178. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 5437004.
  6. ^ Toet, A.; Levi, D. M. (1992-7). "The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea". Vision Research. 32 (7): 1349–1357. ISSN 0042-6989. PMID 1455707. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  7. ^ He, S.; Cavanagh, P.; Intriligator, J. (1996-09-26). "Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness". Nature. 383 (6598): 334–337. doi:10.1038/383334a0. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 8848045.
  8. ^ a b Liu, Tingting; Jiang, Yi; Sun, Xinghuai; He, Sheng (2009-01-27). "Reduction of the crowding effect in spatially adjacent but cortically remote visual stimuli". Current biology: CB. 19 (2): 127–132. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.065. ISSN 1879-0445. PMC PMCPMC3175242. PMID 19135367. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help)
  9. ^ Bex, Peter J.; Dakin, Steven C.; Simmers, Anita J. (2003-12). "The shape and size of crowding for moving targets". Vision Research. 43 (27): 2895–2904. ISSN 0042-6989. PMID 14568377. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  10. ^ Levi, Dennis M.; Carney, Thom (2009-12-15). "Crowding in peripheral vision: why bigger is better". Current biology: CB. 19 (23): 1988–1993. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.056. ISSN 1879-0445. PMC PMCPMC3045113. PMID 19853450. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help)
  11. ^ a b Aghdaee, S. Mehdi (2005). "Adaptation to spiral motion in crowding condition". Perception. 34 (2): 155–162. doi:10.1068/p5298. ISSN 0301-0066. PMID 15832566.
  12. ^ Whitney, David (2005-05-10). "Motion distorts perceived position without awareness of motion". Current biology : CB. 15 (9): R324–R326. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.04.043. ISSN 0960-9822. PMC PMCPMC3890254. PMID 15886084. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help)
  13. ^ Gheri, C.; Morgan, M.J.; Solomon, J.A. (2007). "The relationship between search efficiency and crowding". Perception. 36 (12): 1779–1787. ISSN 0301-0066. PMC PMCPMC2590853. PMID 18283928. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help)
  14. ^ Popple, Ariella V.; Levi, Dennis M. (2005-4). "The perception of spatial order at a glance". Vision Research. 45 (9): 1085–1090. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.008. ISSN 0042-6989. PMID 15707915. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  15. ^ a b Strasburger, Hans (2005-12-29). "Unfocused spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision". Journal of Vision. 5 (11): 1024–1037. doi:10.1167/5.11.8. ISSN 1534-7362. PMID 16441200.
  16. ^ Huckauf, Anke; Knops, Andre; Nuerk, Hans-Christoph; Willmes, Klaus (2008-11). "Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?". Psychological Research. 72 (6): 648–656. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0171-5. ISSN 0340-0727. PMID 18841386. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  17. ^ a b c d Kooi, F. L.; Toet, A.; Tripathy, S. P.; Levi, D. M. (1994). "The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision". Spatial Vision. 8 (2): 255–279. ISSN 0169-1015. PMID 7993878.
  18. ^ a b van den Berg, Ronald; Roerdink, Jos B. T. M.; Cornelissen, Frans W. (2010-01-22). "A neurophysiologically plausible population code model for feature integration explains visual crowding". PLoS computational biology. 6 (1): e1000646. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000646. ISSN 1553-7358. PMC PMCPMC2799670. PMID 20098499. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help)CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  19. ^ a b Andriessen, J. J.; Bouma, H. (1976-1). "Eccentric vision: adverse interactions between line segments". Vision Research. 16 (1): 71–78. ISSN 0042-6989. PMID 1258390. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  20. ^ "Foveal contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system". ResearchGate. Retrieved 2019-05-26.
  21. ^ Chakravarthi, Ramakrishna; Cavanagh, Patrick (2007-03-27). "Temporal properties of the polarity advantage effect in crowding". Journal of Vision. 7 (2): 11.1–13. doi:10.1167/7.2.11. ISSN 1534-7362. PMID 18217826.
  22. ^ Chung, S. T.; Levi, D. M.; Legge, G. E. (2001-6). "Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding". Vision Research. 41 (14): 1833–1850. ISSN 0042-6989. PMID 11369047. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  23. ^ Gheri, C.; Morgan, M.J.; Solomon, J.A. (2007). "The relationship between search efficiency and crowding". Perception. 36 (12): 1779–1787. ISSN 0301-0066. PMC PMCPMC2590853. PMID 18283928. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help)
  24. ^ Gheri, C.; Morgan, M.J.; Solomon, J.A. (2007). "The relationship between search efficiency and crowding". Perception. 36 (12): 1779–1787. ISSN 0301-0066. PMC PMCPMC2590853. PMID 18283928. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help)
  25. ^ Põder, Endel; Wagemans, Johan (2007-11-20). "Crowding with conjunctions of simple features". Journal of Vision. 7 (2): 23.1–12. doi:10.1167/7.2.23. ISSN 1534-7362. PMID 18217838.
  26. ^ Chung, Susana T. L.; Li, Roger W.; Levi, Dennis M. (2007-03-09). "Crowding between first- and second-order letter stimuli in normal foveal and peripheral vision". Journal of Vision. 7 (2): 10.1–13. doi:10.1167/7.2.10. ISSN 1534-7362. PMC PMCPMC2747649. PMID 18217825. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help)
  27. ^ a b Farzin, Faraz; Rivera, Susan M.; Whitney, David (2009-06-29). "Holistic crowding of Mooney faces". Journal of Vision. 9 (6): 18.1–15. doi:10.1167/9.6.18. ISSN 1534-7362. PMC PMCPMC2857385. PMID 19761309. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help)
  28. ^ a b c Louie, Elizabeth G.; Bressler, David W.; Whitney, David (2007-11-26). "Holistic crowding: selective interference between configural representations of faces in crowded scenes". Journal of Vision. 7 (2): 24.1–11. doi:10.1167/7.2.24. ISSN 1534-7362. PMC PMCPMC3849395. PMID 18217839. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help)
  29. ^ Yeshurun, Yaffa; Rashal, Einat (2010-08-18). "Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance". Journal of Vision. 10 (10): 16. doi:10.1167/10.10.16. ISSN 1534-7362. PMID 20884481.
  30. ^ Chakravarthi, Ramakrishna; Cavanagh, Patrick (2009-6). "Bilateral field advantage in visual crowding". Vision Research. 49 (13): 1638–1646. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.026. ISSN 1878-5646. PMC PMCPMC2760476. PMID 19362572. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  31. ^ Pelli, Denis G.; Freeman, Jeremy (2007-01-02). "An escape from crowding". Journal of Vision. 7 (2): 22–22. doi:10.1167/7.2.22. ISSN 1534-7362.
  32. ^ Chakravarthi, Ramakrishna; Cavanagh, Patrick (2009-09-04). "Recovery of a crowded object by masking the flankers: determining the locus of feature integration". Journal of Vision. 9 (10): 4.1–9. doi:10.1167/9.10.4. ISSN 1534-7362. PMC PMCPMC2766569. PMID 19810785. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help)
  33. ^ Wallis, Thomas S. A.; Bex, Peter J. (2011-02-08). "Visual crowding is correlated with awareness". Current biology: CB. 21 (3): 254–258. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.011. ISSN 1879-0445. PMC PMCPMC3051843. PMID 21277208. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help)
  34. ^ Flom, M. C.; Heath, G. G.; Takahashi, E. (1963-11-15). "CONTOUR INTERACTION AND VISUAL RESOLUTION: CONTRALATERAL EFFECTS". Science (New York, N.Y.). 142 (3594): 979–980. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 14069233.
  35. ^ Tripathy, S. P.; Levi, D. M. (1994-5). "Long-range dichoptic interactions in the human visual cortex in the region corresponding to the blind spot". Vision Research. 34 (9): 1127–1138. ISSN 0042-6989. PMID 8184557. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  36. ^ Pelli, Denis G. (2008-8). "Crowding: a cortical constraint on object recognition". Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 18 (4): 445–451. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.09.008. ISSN 0959-4388. PMC PMCPMC3624758. PMID 18835355. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  37. ^ "PsycNET". psycnet.apa.org. Retrieved 2019-06-02.
  38. ^ Bi, Taiyong; Cai, Peng; Zhou, Tiangang; Fang, Fang (2009-10-14). "The effect of crowding on orientation-selective adaptation in human early visual cortex". Journal of Vision. 9 (11): 13.1–10. doi:10.1167/9.11.13. ISSN 1534-7362. PMID 20053076.
  39. ^ Motter, Brad C. (2006-09-20). "Modulation of transient and sustained response components of V4 neurons by temporal crowding in flashed stimulus sequences". The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 26 (38): 9683–9694. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5495-05.2006. ISSN 1529-2401. PMID 16988039.
  40. ^ Merigan, W. H. (2000-11). "Cortical area V4 is critical for certain texture discriminations, but this effect is not dependent on attention". Visual Neuroscience. 17 (6): 949–958. ISSN 0952-5238. PMID 11193111. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  41. ^ a b Levi, Dennis M. (2008-2). "Crowding--an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini-review". Vision Research. 48 (5): 635–654. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.009. ISSN 0042-6989. PMC PMCPMC2268888. PMID 18226828. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  42. ^ Pelli, Denis G; Tillman, Katharine A (2008-10). "The uncrowded window of object recognition". Nature neuroscience. 11 (10): 1129–1135. doi:10.1038/nn.2187. ISSN 1097-6256. PMC PMCPMC2772078. PMID 18828191. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
  43. ^ Martelli, Marialuisa; Majaj, Najib J.; Pelli, Denis G. (2005-02-04). "Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts". Journal of Vision. 5 (1): 58–70. doi:10.1167/5.1.6. ISSN 1534-7362. PMID 15831067.
  44. ^ Tripathy, Srimant P.; Cavanagh, Patrick (2002-9). "The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size". Vision Research. 42 (20): 2357–2369. ISSN 0042-6989. PMID 12350424. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  45. ^ Pelli, Denis G; Tillman, Katharine A (2008-10). "The uncrowded window of object recognition". Nature neuroscience. 11 (10): 1129–1135. doi:10.1038/nn.2187. ISSN 1097-6256. PMC PMCPMC2772078. PMID 18828191. {{cite journal}}: Check |pmc= value (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Anandhu_Rejikumar/sandbox&oldid=900530955"