User:Ballerinarunner/sandbox

Article evaluation: Workplace mentoring

For the article on Workplace Mentoring, they have a lacking amount of information. The whole article is only a paragraph in length and only has two sources. The Talk page shows the last edit occurred in May of 2014. What the Talk page shows is that this page has had little growth and that they have not had the chance to be edited. I found that the actual site started as an educational page. It was first requested to be taken down in April 2014 but was not due to it being a wikistudent project. It has a sub class rating and only a mid-importance on the scale. On the scale ranking it shows an A for the article being organized and being complete. But the assignment also needs to make some peer edits to make it stronger. The information shows that we need to work on editing some of the content to make it flow better. The article is ranked at a good standing article but to make it better one of the things that we should do is to add more content, and breaking up the topics into different sub topics. The big problem that is repeated is the need for more content. As a group we will need to work together to find enough information to make sure that it has enough content. When reading we will need to work together to figure out what subtopics we will want to make sure that we have enough information in each section to keep the A standard of writing. When we add more content then we would also be able to redirects to the project, this will also increase the project’s ranking.