Jump to content

User:Bfpage/ga guidelines and templates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Taking this review as requested -

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
  1. B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable'
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
  1. B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  2. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  3. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. Is it stable?
  1. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  2. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

[edit]

References

[edit]

On hold

[edit]

This is a very nice article; well written, comprehensive and also well sourced. I couldn't find anything wrong with the references and the prose issues I mentioned above were only relatively minor. I also apologise for leaving this review late as I'm having troubles with my PC, so I should have the other one to you by tomorrow.

Close - promoted

[edit]