User:Brichcja/Communication and Information Skills in Chemistry

Course name

Communication and Information Skills in Chemistry

Institution

University of Bristol

Instructor

Dr Chris Adams

Subject

Chemistry

Course dates

2016-02-08 – 2016-06-30

Approximate number of student editors

200

This is a whole year course for first year undergraduate chemistry students, entitled 'Communication and Information Skills in Chemistry'. The whole emphasis of the course is on teaching students how to write well, how to find reliable information and how to reference, and the WP exercise is a culmination of the whole thing. There will be up to 200 students, but they will work in small groups.

Timeline

Week 1 (2016-02-08): Wikipedia essentials

In class

• Overview of the course
• Introduction to how Wikipedia will be used in the course
• Understanding Wikipedia as a community, we'll discuss its expectations and etiquette
• Handout: Editing Wikipedia (available in print or online from the Wiki Education Foundation)

Week 2 (2016-02-15): Editing basics

In class

• Basics of editing
• Anatomy of Wikipedia articles, what makes a good article, how to distinguish between good and bad articles
• Collaborating and engaging with the Wiki editing community
• Tips on finding the best articles to work on for class assignments
• Handouts: Using Talk Pages handout and Evaluating Wikipedia brochure

Assignment (due Week 3)

• Create an account and then complete the online training for students. During this training, you will make edits in a sandbox and learn the basic rules of Wikipedia.

• Create a User page, and then click the "enroll" button on the top left of this course page.

• To practice editing and communicating on Wikipedia, introduce yourself on the user talk page of one of your classmates, who should also be enrolled in the table at the bottom of the page.
• Explore topics related to your topic area to get a feel for how Wikipedia is organized. What areas seem to be missing? As you explore, make a mental note of articles that seem like good candidates for improvement.

Milestones

• All students have Wikipedia user accounts and are listed on the course page.

Week 3 (2016-02-22): Exploring the topic area

In class

• Be prepared to discuss some of your observations about Wikipedia articles your topic area that are missing or could use improvement.
• Handouts: Choosing an article

Assignment (due Week 4)

Week 4 (2016-02-29): Using sources and choosing articles

In class

• Handouts: Citing sources on Wikipedia and Avoiding plagiarism on Wikipedia.
  • Be prepared to explain close paraphrasing, plagiarism, and copyright violations on Wikipedia.

Assignment (due Week 5)

• Your instructor has created a list of potential topics for your main project. Choose the one you will work on.

For next week

• Instructor evaluates student's article selections, by next week.

Week 5 (2016-03-07): Finalizing topics and starting research

In class

• Discuss the topics students will be working on, and determine strategies for researching and writing about them.

Assignment (due Week 6)

• By the start of our next class, find an article you want to work on and mark the article's talk page with a banner to let other editors know you're working on it. To add the banner, add this code in the top section of the talk page:

{{course assignment | course = User:Brichcja/Communication and Information Skills in Chemistry | term = Spring 2016 }}

• Add a link to your selected article to the table at the bottom of this course page.
• Compile a bibliography of relevant, reliable sources and post it to the talk page of the article you are working on. Begin reading the sources. Make sure to check in on the talk page (or watchlist) to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.

Week 6 (2016-03-14): Drafting starter articles

In class

• Talk about Wikipedia culture and etiquette, and (optionally) revisit the concept of sandboxes and how to use them.
• Q&A session with instructor about interacting on Wikipedia and getting started with writing.

Assignment (due Week 7)

• If you are starting a new article, write an outline of the topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia lead section of 3–4 paragraphs in your sandbox. Wikipedia articles use "summary style", in which the lead section provides a balanced summary of the entire body of the article, with the first sentence serving to define the topic and place it in context. The lead section should summarize, very briefly, each of the main aspects of the topic that will be covered in detail in the rest of the article. If you are improving an existing article, draft a new lead section reflecting your proposed changes, and post this along with a brief description of your plans on the article’s talk page. Make sure to check that page often to gather any feedback the community might provide.
• Begin working with classmates and other editors to polish your lead section and fix any major issues.
• Continue research in preparation for writing the body of the article.

Milestones

• All students have started editing articles or drafts on Wikipedia.

Week 7 (2016-03-21): Moving articles to the main space

In class

• We'll discuss moving your article out of your sandboxes and into Wikipedia's main space.
• Handout: Moving out of your sandbox
• A general reminder: Don't panic if your contribution disappears, and don't try to force it back in.
  • Check to see if there is an explanation of the edit on the article's talk page. If not, (politely) ask why it was removed.
  • Contact your instructor or Wikipedia Content Expert and let them know.

Assignment (due Week 8)

• Move your sandbox articles into main space.
  • If you are expanding an existing article, copy your edit into the article. If you are making many small edits, save after each edit before you make the next one. Do NOT paste over the entire existing article, or large sections of the existing article.
  • If you are creating a new article, do NOT copy and paste your text, or there will be no record of your work history. Follow these instructions on how to move your work.

• Optional: For new articles or qualifying expansions of stubs, compose a one-sentence “hook,” nominate it for “Did you know,” (see detailed instructions) and monitor the nomination for any issues identified by other editors. Wiki Education Foundation staff can provide support for this process.

• Begin expanding your article into a comprehensive treatment of the topic.

Week 8 (2016-03-28): Building articles

In class

• Demo uploading images and adding images to articles.
• Share experiences and discuss problems.
• Handouts: "Illustrating Wikipedia" (pgs 4-7) and "Evaluating Wikipedia article quality" (handed out originally earlier in the course)

Assignment (due Week 9)

• Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the table at the bottom of this course page, add your username next to the articles you will peer review. (You don’t need to start reviewing yet.)

Week 9 (2016-04-04): Creating first draft

Assignment (due Week 10)

• Expand your article into an initial draft of a comprehensive treatment of the topic.

Week 10 (2016-04-11): Getting and giving feedback

In class

• As a group, offer suggestions for improving one or two other students' articles, based on your ideas of what makes a solid encyclopedia article.

Assignment (due Week 11)

• Peer review two of your classmates’ articles. Leave suggestions on the article talk pages.
• Copy-edit the two reviewed articles.

Milestones

• Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 11 (2016-04-18): Responding to feedback

In class

• Open discussion of the concepts of neutrality, media literacy, and the impact and limits of Wikipedia.

Assignment (due Week 12)

• Make edits to your article based on peers’ feedback. If you disagree with a suggestion, use talk pages to politely discuss and come to a consensus on your edit.

Milestones

• Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 12 (2016-04-25): Continuing to improve articles

In class

• Continue discussing how the articles can be further improved. Come up with improvement goals for each article for next week.

Assignment (due Week 13)

• Return to your classmates' articles you previously reviewed, and provide more suggestions for further improvement. If there is a disagreement, suggest a compromise.
• Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on your classmates' suggestions and any additional areas for improvement you can identify.

Week 13 (2016-05-02): Continuing to improve articles

In class

• Continue discussing how the articles can be further improved. Come up with improvement goals for each article for next week.

Assignment (due Week 14)

• Return to your classmates' articles you previously reviewed, and provide more suggestions for further improvement. If there is a disagreement, suggest a compromise.
• Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on your classmates' suggestions and any additional areas for improvement you can identify.

Week 14 (2016-05-09): Continuing to improve articles

In class

• Continue discussing how the articles can be further improved. Come up with improvement goals for each article for next week.

Assignment (due Week 15)

• Return to your classmates' articles you previously reviewed, and provide more suggestions for further improvement. If there is a disagreement, suggest a compromise.
• Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on your classmates' suggestions and any additional areas for improvement you can identify.

Week 15 (2016-05-16): Finishing touches

Assignment (due Week 16)

• Add final touches to your Wikipedia article. You can find a handy reference guide here.

Milestones

• Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.

Week 16 (2016-05-23): Due date

Milestones

• Students have finished all their work on Wikipedia that will be considered for grading.

Grading

  5%  

   Completion of Wikipedia training

  15%  

   Early Wikipedia exercises

  20%  

   Quality of bibliography and outline

  10%  

   Peer reviews and collaboration with classmates

  50%  

   Quality of your main Wikipedia contributions