User:C.erynn15/Black psychology/KStevens48 Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
General info[edit]
- Whose work are you reviewing?
C.erynn15
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:C.erynn15/Black_psychology?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Black psychology - Wikipedia
Evaluate the drafted changes[edit]
The edit's titles should follow the order of the titles in the article. This would make it easier to follow.
Early Contributors - The edit for this section is a good addition. There is good information and detail in the edit, but it is more descriptive than the previously published contributors. This may appear as though this person is more important or favored than the others. Perhaps adding more information if avaiable on the other contributors would be beneficial.
Organizations - The edit for this section is well-written. Adding the links to the sites for both the added organizations and the previously published Association of Black Psyhochologists could be beneficial for the edit and for the readers. Adding any Wikipedia articles that addresses the added organizations (like what was done for the Association of Black Psychologists) towards the end of the article under the "See Also" section could also be helpful.
References - This section in the edit is not completed or formatted correctly. The added links and references as shown in the edit should be under Footnotes, and there should be an additionnal reference under the References section that matches in format with the others.
Overall, the edit is good and on the right track. Just some minor fixes should make it a wonderful addition to the article. :)