User:Caitlincoker/Modifications (genetics)/Bibliography

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

This is where you will compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.

Tikhodeyev, Oleg. (2015). Crisis of the term “mutation” and its resolution in the context of the differential concept of variability. Biology Bulletin Reviews. 5. 119-129.
- summary: This is an article published in the Biology Bulletin Reviews, so it should be a credible source. It covers the ambiguity over the term "mutation", which is a huge problem in this article. Helps to clarify this issue.
^[1]
- summary: This book goes into detail about methods that are used which is helpful and talks about increased precision and technology for molecular modification of DNA. Also, it distinguishes between intended and unintended effects, which is important and something I would like to add to this article
^[2]
- This article would be useful for the methods or possibly future implications section of this article because it talks about CRISPR developments
^[3]
- This is useful because it specifically takes about genetic modification in Zebra Fish which is relevant because scientists study this fish because it is comparable to humans
^[4]
- This source is useful because it suggests a method of introducing genetic changes in human cells called 'RNA programmed genome editing
^[5]
- This article is important because it is a review and it is from someone who acted on the committee responsible for evaluating the ethics and making recommendations for human genome editing. This will be a great addition the ethics section
^[6]
- This is also looking into the ethics of human genome editing. This source is useful because it does go into some of the history of this field within the past 10 or so years, providing context.
^[7]
- This source is important and helpful because it helps to talk about the environmental factors that influence the genome.
^[8]
- This is a review about GMO's and food, provides insight as to why people may like or dislike genetic modification in a consumption context
^[9]
- good source talking about future implications. They make a good point saying that modified organisms for consumption may impact their ecosystem, which may further impact humans (environmental) (feedback)
^[10]
- This is an article published by the UN: "the good bad and ugly". Looking at a rounded analysis of genetic modification and its impacts on people/the world.

References

^ Environment, National Research Council (US) Committee on Scientific Evaluation of the Introduction of Genetically Modified Microorganisms and Plants into the (1989). Properties of the Genetic Modification. National Academies Press (US).
^ Knott, Gavin J.; Doudna, Jennifer A. (2018-08-31). "CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering". Science. doi:10.1126/science.aat5011. PMC 6455913. PMID 30166482.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
^ Rafferty, Sara A.; Quinn, T. Alexander (2018-10-01). "A beginner's guide to understanding and implementing the genetic modification of zebrafish". Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. The Use of Zebrafish for Cardiac Research. 138: 3–19. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.07.005. ISSN 0079-6107.
^ Jinek, Martin; East, Alexandra; Cheng, Aaron; Lin, Steven; Ma, Enbo; Doudna, Jennifer (2013-01-29). Weigel, Detlef (ed.). "RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells". eLife. 2: e00471. doi:10.7554/eLife.00471. ISSN 2050-084X.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
^ Coller, Barry S. (2019-01-27). "Ethics of Human Genome Editing". Annual Review of Medicine. 70 (1): 289–305. doi:10.1146/annurev-med-112717-094629. ISSN 0066-4219.
^ Munsie, Megan; Gyngell, Christopher (2018-10-01). "Ethical issues in genetic modification and why application matters". Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. Cell reprogramming, regeneration and repair. 52: 7–12. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2018.05.002. ISSN 0959-437X.
^ Olden, Kenneth; Freudenberg, Nicholas; Dowd, Jennifer Beam; Shields, Alexandra E. (2011-05). "Discovering how environmental exposures alter genes and could lead to new treatments for chronic illnesses". Health affairs (Project Hope). 30 (5). doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0078. PMID 21555469. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
^ Zhang, Chen; Wohlhueter, Robert; Zhang, Han (2016-09-01). "Genetically modified foods: A critical review of their promise and problems". Food Science and Human Wellness. 5 (3): 116–123. doi:10.1016/j.fshw.2016.04.002. ISSN 2213-4530.
^ Howard, Heidi C.; El, Carla G. van; Forzano, Francesca; Radojkovic, Dragica; Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle; Wert, Guido de; Borry, Pascal; Cornel, Martina C.; Genetics, on behalf of the Public and Professional Policy Committee of the European Society of Human (2018-01). "One small edit for humans, one giant edit for humankind? Points and questions to consider for a responsible way forward for gene editing in humans". European Journal of Human Genetics. 26 (1): 1. doi:10.1038/s41431-017-0024-z. PMID 29192152. {{cite journal}}: |first9= has generic name (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)
^ https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/FTQ_May_2019.pdf

[1] Environment, National Research Council (US) Committee on Scientific Evaluation of the Introduction of Genetically Modified Microorganisms and Plants into the (1989). Properties of the Genetic Modification. National Academies Press (US).

[2] Knott, Gavin J.; Doudna, Jennifer A. (2018-08-31). "CRISPR-Cas guides the future of genetic engineering". Science. doi:10.1126/science.aat5011. PMC 6455913. PMID 30166482.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)

[3] Rafferty, Sara A.; Quinn, T. Alexander (2018-10-01). "A beginner's guide to understanding and implementing the genetic modification of zebrafish". Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. The Use of Zebrafish for Cardiac Research. 138: 3–19. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.07.005. ISSN 0079-6107.

[4] Jinek, Martin; East, Alexandra; Cheng, Aaron; Lin, Steven; Ma, Enbo; Doudna, Jennifer (2013-01-29). Weigel, Detlef (ed.). "RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells". eLife. 2: e00471. doi:10.7554/eLife.00471. ISSN 2050-084X.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)

[5] Coller, Barry S. (2019-01-27). "Ethics of Human Genome Editing". Annual Review of Medicine. 70 (1): 289–305. doi:10.1146/annurev-med-112717-094629. ISSN 0066-4219.

[6] Munsie, Megan; Gyngell, Christopher (2018-10-01). "Ethical issues in genetic modification and why application matters". Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. Cell reprogramming, regeneration and repair. 52: 7–12. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2018.05.002. ISSN 0959-437X.

[7] Olden, Kenneth; Freudenberg, Nicholas; Dowd, Jennifer Beam; Shields, Alexandra E. (2011-05). "Discovering how environmental exposures alter genes and could lead to new treatments for chronic illnesses". Health affairs (Project Hope). 30 (5). doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0078. PMID 21555469. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

[8] Zhang, Chen; Wohlhueter, Robert; Zhang, Han (2016-09-01). "Genetically modified foods: A critical review of their promise and problems". Food Science and Human Wellness. 5 (3): 116–123. doi:10.1016/j.fshw.2016.04.002. ISSN 2213-4530.

[9] Howard, Heidi C.; El, Carla G. van; Forzano, Francesca; Radojkovic, Dragica; Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle; Wert, Guido de; Borry, Pascal; Cornel, Martina C.; Genetics, on behalf of the Public and Professional Policy Committee of the European Society of Human (2018-01). "One small edit for humans, one giant edit for humankind? Points and questions to consider for a responsible way forward for gene editing in humans". European Journal of Human Genetics. 26 (1): 1. doi:10.1038/s41431-017-0024-z. PMID 29192152. {{cite journal}}: |first9= has generic name (help); Check date values in: |date= (help)

[10] ttps://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/FTQ_May_2019.pdf

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]