User:Cis2002

Wikipedia is a load of lies. Mormons and Jehovah Witnesses are not Christian, and they do not worship Jesus Christ or the Christian God.

Yet this place obviously does not want that distinction to be known and the administrators bully you with threats of blocking if you try to correct this misinformation.

So much for Wikipedia being accurate.

Now I'm told that I can't even express a criticism of Wikipedia or I'll be booted. So we have to be robots and say everything is great and perfect or else they won't let you play ball with them. What are we back in grade school? Can't I have a dissenting voice?

"Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy Wikipedia is not a moot court, and although rules can make things easier, they are not the purpose of the community. Instruction creep should be avoided. A perceived procedural error made in posting anything, such as an idea or nomination, is not grounds for invalidating that post. Follow the spirit, not the letter, of any rules, policies and guidelines if you feel they conflict. Disagreements should be resolved through consensual discussion, rather than through tightly sticking to rules and procedures." Hmmm...seems to be the very thing that is being done, I post something and it is removed or I'm threatened with being booted. As for my user page, what statement I ask again is anything but criticism? Possibly the statement "Wikipedia is a load of lies" but certainly not "Mormons and Jehovah Witnesses are not Christian, and they do not worship Jesus Christ or the Christian God" this is a statement of fact. The term Christianity refers to those that worship Jesus as God. If you don't then you are not a Christian - fact. If the United States which is a democratic republic was ruled by a monarchy then it would cease to be considered a democratic republic regardless of it's statements or history the same is true of non-Christian groups.

This is a direct quote from an administrator "Please see Conservapedia — it's a Wikipedia for Americans who want to ignore reasoned argument, academia and the rest of the world. I think they allow 'This is what I learnt in Sunday School' as an authoritative source there, so you might be in with a chance. — Gareth Hughes 12:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)" so much for following the rules that I am told that I am breaking.Cis2002 13:43, 14 March 2007 (UTC)