User:Daifawei/Bianyifang/Ririying Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

Whose work are you reviewing? - Daifawei
Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Daifawei/Bianyifang

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
- Yes
Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Yes
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- Yes
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- Yes
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
- It's well-balanced

Lead evaluation

Good

Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?
- Yes
Is the content added up-to-date?
- Yes
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- No

Content evaluation

Very good!

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?
- Yes
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- No
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Neither
Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- No

Tone and balance evaluation

The article has a neutral tone. If I were you I would change the exclamation mark (!) into a period (.) of this sentence "Then the delicious dish is ready! " for making the article more academically.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Yes
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Yes
Are the sources current?
- Yes
Check a few links. Do they work?
- Yes

Sources and references evaluation

Good

Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- Yes
Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- No
Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- Yes

Organization evaluation

Well-organized

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Kind of. I think the picture of the front door of any Bianyifang will better than the one on the page right now.
Are images well-captioned?
- Yes
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Yes
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
- Yes

Images and media evaluation

You could add more pictures of the interior of the restaurant and more pics about the roast duck.

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
- Yes
How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
- Yes
Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
- Yes
Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
- Yes

New Article Evaluation

Good job!

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
- Definitely
What are the strengths of the content added?
- It gave viewers more concise understanding of this famous Beijing restaurant chain. And viewers will have an idea of how to cook the roast duck.
How can the content added be improved?
- You can use some news articles to provide more information of its popularity in China. And it's reputation among people as well.

Overall evaluation

I like the citation sources and the way you constructed the article. Good job!