User:Daiisyy/Popeyes Chicken Sandwich/Emmalovespinacoladas Peer Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer review[edit]

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info[edit]

Lead[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
  • Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, the subject just needs to be bolder I think.
  • Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, indirectly
  • Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
  • Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise

Lead evaluation[edit]

Content[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, very
  • Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, the whole article is very timely
  • Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? As of writing this, there is some missing content under the Negative section under the Reviews heading.

Content evaluation[edit]

Tone and Balance[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added neutral? Yes
  • Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
  • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, once the negative reviews section is updated
  • Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, just inform

Tone and balance evaluation[edit]

Sources and References[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
  • Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, many different sources are used
  • Are the sources current? Yes
  • Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation[edit]

Organization[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
  • Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? There is an unnecessary comma after the word “Once” in the second sentence under the Advertisement heading, and in the last sentence under the Advertisement heading, I think it should be “whose” instead of “who’s”. Also, I think the term “every bodies” under the Social Media heading should change to a different word such as “users”.
  • Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organization evaluation[edit]

Images and Media[edit]

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

  • Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No
  • Are images well-captioned? N/a
  • Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/a
  • Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/a

Images and media evaluation[edit]

For New Articles Only[edit]

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

  • Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes
  • How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? There are about eight sources, and there ar é probably even more out there. They represent the current literature well.
  • Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes, I think the topic in the lead just need to be bolded.
  • Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Not yet.

New Article Evaluation[edit]

Overall impressions[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
  • What are the strengths of the content added? The overall inclusion of this interesting phenomenon to be recorded through Wikipedia.
  • How can the content added be improved? Pictures of that sandwich!!! :)

Overall evaluation[edit]

Good job and I can’t wait to see where this page goes! :)