User:Davidovic/ppa
Pro-pedophile activism or Pro-paedophile activism (Commonwealth usage) encompasses pro-pedophile organizations and activists that argue for certain changes of criminal laws and cultural response in order to allow pedophiles to sexually abuse[1] children.[2][3] The obverse movement is anti-pedophile activism, which aims to protect children from predatory pedophiles.[4][5] Goals of pro-pedophile activism also include removing the legal protection parents have to prevent their children falling into the hands of pedophiles,[6] social acceptance of adults' sexual attraction to children, social acceptance of sexual activity between adults and children, and changes in institutions of concern to pedophiles, such as changing age of consent laws or mental illness classifications.[citation needed] Some pro-pedophile groups are involved in opposing vigilante groups that target anyone with a sexual attraction to children.[7][8]
Some pro-pedophile activists advocate social acceptance of what they consider to be adult romantic love[9] and sexual attraction to minors, as well as the legalization of what they believe to be non-abusive and mutually consenting adult-minor sexual activity, activity that is currently defined in most legal contexts as child sexual abuse. Other goals of pro-pedophile activism may, but do not necessarily, include the redefinition of contemporary authority relations between adults and minors, and the changing of institutions of concern to pedophiles, such as age of consent laws and mental disorder classifications.[10][11]
Increasing public focus and disapproval of pedophilia has motivated more stringent legislation and stricter criminal penalties regarding child pornography, child sexual abuse, and the use of the internet to facilitate these activities.[citation needed] To consider pro-pedophile activism as a valid political or civil rights activist movement is also unpopular. The movement faces virulent opposition.[12] Camille Paglia said, "These days, especially in America, boy-love is not only scandalous and criminal but somehow in bad taste."[13]
- ^ The Sexual Exploitation of Children, University of Pennsylvania Center for Youth Policy Studies, U.S. National Institute of Justice, August 2001.
- ^ http://www.clinicalsocialwork.com/incest.html
- ^ http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28336
- ^ http://www.thestandard.com/article.php?story=20040227211153249
- ^ http://www.vachss.com/av_dispatches/parade_071402.html
- ^ http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.net/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?noframes;read=69831
- ^ http://anu.nfshost.com/2007/because-its-not-about-the-children
- ^ http://www.the-signal.com/?module=displaystory&story_id=50916
- ^ http://www.glgarden.org/kalikokat/pacm_manifesto.htm Manifesto of Pedophiles Against Child Molestation (P.A.C.M.)
- ^ "The Case for Abolishing the Age of Consent Laws," an editorial from NAMBLA News (1980), reproduced in We Are Everywhere: A Historical Sourcebook of Gay and Lesbian Politics. Ed. by Mark Blasius and Shane Phelan. London: Routledge, 1997. pgs. 459-67.
- ^ DSM-IV-TR: Pedophilia BehaveNet.com
- ^ Jenkins, Philip. Pedophiles and Priests: Anatomy of a Contemporary Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. pg. 78: "Pedophile [as a word] implies coercion, exploitation, and even violence, so that to show any tolerance or sympathy for the condition is socially unacceptable."
- ^ Paglia, Camille. Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990. pg. 116.