8:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC): 2a00:23c7:2b86:9800:1d4c:5458:cbd8:e267 reverts my edit with the summary "Please don't change material in quotes" (diff). Edit contained other changes with no indication of objection to them which were reverted also (Revert 1)
9:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC): I (DesertPipeline) revert reversion with the summary "quote punctuation should be corrected per MOS:CONFORM" (diff) (Revert 1)
10:05, 3 August 2021 (UTC): 2a00:23c7:2b86:9800:1d4c:5458:cbd8:e267 reverts my reversion of their reversion with edit summary "Please don't edit war - per BRD, use the talk page. I have explained the changes I made and the reasons are firm (not changing the text of quotes, the anchor per documentation, etc). Some other changes were not improvements from the WP:STATUS QUO" (Special:Diff/1036897142) – no specific explanation for reverting other changes provided (Revert 2)
10:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC): I revert the reversion of my reversion with the summary "invalid revert reason. Please check MOS:CONFORM and don't revert an entire edit because you disagree with a single change in it. Anchor documentation was changed but I see no actual consensus for that change in the MOS archives" (diff) (Revert 2)
10:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC): 2a00:23c7:2b86:9800:1d4c:5458:cbd8:e267 reverts my reversion of their reversion with the summary "Again, you do realise the BRD applies here? 1. I have read CONFIRM and that is not entirely applicable here (use the talk page and I'll explain); 2. Template documentation is there, whether you agree with it or not" (Special:Diff/1036898295) (Revert 3)
10:33, 3 August 2021 (UTC): I start talk page discussion (diff)
10:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC): I revert the reversion of my reversion again with the summary "see talk" (diff) (Revert 3)
10:36, 3 August 2021 (UTC): 2a00:23c7:2b86:9800:1d4c:5458:cbd8:e267 reverts my reversion of their reversion again with the summary " See STATUS QUO - it remains in place until the discussion is over" (diff) (Revert 4)
10:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC): I partially revert to the revision where I made the original changes while changing the semicolon back to a comma and substituting the anchor inside the section heading, which were the objected-to changes (diff) (Revert 4)
10:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC): 2a00:23c7:2b86:9800:1d4c:5458:cbd8:e267 reverts my edit with the summary "You don't seem to understand this. I am objecting to the poor changes you have made. STATUS QUO and BRD are bloody clear on this, so just STOP and use the talk page" (diff) (Revert 5)
11:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC): 2a00:23c7:2b86:9800:1d4c:5458:cbd8:e267 warns me about edit warring on my talk page (diff)
