User:Dialectic-scietist1

                                            WHAT MEANS THE RED SHIFTING PHENOMENON
                                                   A DIALECTIC EXPLANATION                   

    Red shifting is a physical phenomenon. It is physical because exists and we can realize it. The phenomenon is an optical phenomenon as many others because mainly has to do with the part of specter of the electromagnetic radiation we call visible light, but we can say that begins and finishing over all the spectrum of electromagnetism.
    The process can begin from the gamma radiation and to continues increasing the wave length up to microwave radiation and darkness. This occurs when the beam production of an electromagnetic radiation from a warm body begin from low wavelength and for some reason it reaches the observation in a different increased wavelength.
    The main theory about the cause and the reasons of the red shifting is that the space is expanding, it isn't static and because of the expansion a Doppler phenomenon occurs and this increases the wavelength. The Doppler phenomenon is well known from sound waves, and means that when the source of a sound comes closer to the observation he will hear step by step the sound to be more loud and if the source does the opposite and move to a more far away distance from the observer the sound will going to lose step by step strength. The same thing happens, as they say, and with the light when the source of the light travels in a direction away from the observer. This is causing the light to red shift. This is also truth, but it means trajectories of the source and not expansion, because happens and the opposite, the decreasing of the wave length when the trajectory of the source is coming closer to the observer. For that reason and the nuance of the red is different in the red shifting zone.
    There is another old theory which the today Astrophysicists reject, the theory of the tiered light. This theory suggest that the photons are losing energy because they have to travel great distances in space till the arrival in the observer, and they're loosing energy from collisions with different material objects like electrons and others. That could has some truth, because as we know today the space isn't full of Ether, but also it isn't empty. The theory, the critics said, means a static Universe. Why that means static universe?
    Is the Universe static? Definitely no, but the expansion it isn't the only motion in the Universe. Even more, it could even happen not to exist expansion at all, except from the motion of everything in the Universe on trajectories. Our planetary system is hunting our Sun as it travels on it trajectory inside our Milky Way. Is A Milky Way static? No, it travels on its trajectory inside the cluster of galaxies in which our galaxy have its membership. Also, the cluster is traveling ... So, nothing is static even our galaxy has collisions and consumes smaller galaxies, or even in time if the galaxy becomes bigger and bigger it could begin loosing parts as new galaxies. This phenomenon has already been observed in other regions of the Universe. The conclusion is that there isn't something like static universe. Every day brings Earth, in a new space spot, absolute not repeatable before.
   The next thing that we have to estimate for doing a conclusion about red shifting, is first that any observation has to be repeated with a physics experiment worked on a theory and the result of the experiment to come near the observation. Do we have a such an experiment that could prove the expansion? No? No!
   And at last, the most important thing that we have to comprehend well is what we really can see in space. Do we see real time light's sources, or these we see are very old image idols of galaxies and galactic clusters and stars in spots inside the Universe when they happened to be there before even billion of years? Isn't this the truth of the limits on the speed of the light travel? So, we see the past and only the past. The light from our Sun which can someone says that this moment is emitted, it will arrive to Earth after 8–9 minutes. But what means that? That means that if I had the power of a magician and with my magic wand this moment I take away our Sun everybody will realize that that has happened after 8–9 minutes and the first will be the Japans. Can you image that the image idol of the Sun will continuous to be present there for more than 8 minutes after the Sun disapiars? But I will be in the position to tell you that something has happened. The sky will change color from blue to green. Then it becomes yellow then red and soon we will have darkness. Is this an expansion phenomenon or it is a tiered light phenomenon? No, at all, it is only a DEPLETION OF THE ENERGY OF THE SUN'S IMAGE IDOL. 
   That will be described and by the physics law of Planck and Wien if we try the solution of the formulas about the wavelength λ. λ = σ/Τ. λ= hc/E and that means that if in something warm the temperature falls and that means also and that the energy falls, then the wavelength of the produced image idol the λ will going to increase and to redshifted. That exact it is what is happening with the image idols we see and only these are what we see from the far distance galaxies images. And that happens simply because till the light to arrive to the observer from one image idol and let say have pass 1 billion of years, at the same time, the galaxy which has produced these images idols on its trajectory will not be any more behind them, because as we accept the universe isn't static. So, is it possible then the galactic source supply with energy when at this time actually the galaxy now it is in an invisible position and which will become visible after 1 billion of years. And as far away the galaxy exists, these image idols of the same galaxy will become more and more, this phenomenon has been observed by NASA, but they are giving an explanation about the phenomenon through gravity, but I prefer for the light the optics explanations. Do that means that the red shifting or the existence of the microwave radiation is caused by expansion of the Universe or depletion in the energy of the old image idols because these do not have any more energy supply? 
    And as I have said, the physics is an experiment. So, I invite everybody to buy one regular flashlight and after that to leave it on till the depletion of its battery occurs. What do you believe will happens to the light of the source? Isn't going to red shifted step by step? Even more, in a laboratory with specter analyzes we will discover even microwaves. 
    If someone wants to prove me wrong, please, suggest to me an experiment of space expansion.