User:Djcmjr

Why and when to follow up writing each of its articles

"An exquisite dessert!" to say you after you savor it, while congratulating who prepares it, even though, after he learns, that was made ​​by his worst enemy. Although it is not easy to do this, you do not change your mind, since you are neutral and objective . In this case, being a neutral and objective, let the judge be the sense that each human beings have in common, taste and no prejudice. In addition, it allows, if you are a lover of good food, also to prepare delicious desserts.

Now, something similar happens when you cried, saying, "A great item!" after it finishes reading the time and thinks highly of whoever has written this article look even offensive. You do not change your mind because you are objective and neutral; and allows them to use, one of the most important tools ( laws or mandatory standards) from wikipedia, in addition to law , need to use it and is in the inner self of man and that is the same as wikipedia says:

"Use common sense"

Therefore, only when it is objective and neutral, it leaves it ( common sense ) judge if an item that is drawn or drafted, is excellently done! and let not prejudice whoever does, even though the article that goes against one's own interest or has been drafted by the worst of enemies. Moreover, if one is also a lover of good editorial articles or read up so that you can make an excellent job of writing in any of the articles in wikipedia ! 's important to use it (the common sense ).

For this reason, you should continue writing each of the items from the wikipedia until this sense of individual human beings inside says: " That excellent article is wikipedia East " , but of course, (one by prejudice), or audibly outside may not even do so and to say, " I hate this article! "

How to get an item is deemed as outstanding

Using the same analogy of a tasty and delicious dessert, is also appreciated, if it looks to the eye like one!

So besides using common sense to prepare a paper, it is important also that the style or look attractive and orderly format as wikipedia itself says:

'"' The editors should follow [...] [the manual of style], except common sense, and occasional exceptions serve to improve the article '"»

This is, if we add the recommendations of the manual of style along with common sense, it is achieved that the article, which is drafted, is excellent both when read as when he takes a look at first sight, making it more likely to be taken into account as an excellent item to highlight it.

This is an example of note