User:Elizab57/Evaluate an Article
 | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?[edit]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybe_Corporation
Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?[edit]
The reason I chose this article to evaluate was because it happened to be the most recent article I visited on the site. This article details the history of an entertainment company in South Korea, so the details need to be consistent. That is, everything published in this article should be easy for the public (as well as editors) to correct and fact check if need be.
Evaluate the article[edit]
The lead section of the article easily defines what the topic will be for the entire paper. It provides a brief history of how the company started and the labels under the leadership of the HYBE Corporation. The content within the article describes each aspect of the company, including the history of the corporation, the subsidiaries signed under the head company, as well as the productions completed by the company. The article does a good job of not focusing on one particular project/group. The article weighs each of the project equally and describes each of their impacts on the company as a whole. The references appear to be neutral and factually sound. The article follows a clear outline and is simple for the reader to follow. The piece does not seem to have any grammar or punctuation issues that detract from the reader's understanding.