User:EndurinFreedom
Haha!
- There is simply no credible scientist support this ridiculous notion -- it's not a scientific hypothesis at all, but merely a conspiracy theory. No credible sources call it a hypothesis. That's what the mainstream press calls it, so that's what we're going to call it here. Morton devonshire 18:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, as quoted in this section, NIST, the single most credible source in the article, calls it a hypothesis.--Thomas Basboll 18:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- There is simply no credible scientist support this ridiculous notion -- it's not a scientific hypothesis at all, but merely a conspiracy theory. No credible sources call it a hypothesis. That's what the mainstream press calls it, so that's what we're going to call it here. Morton devonshire 18:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)