User:Erpert/RfC draft

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: ~~~~), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 20:49, 9 July 2024 (UTC).

---

• Hullaballoo Wolfowitz

---

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute

Hullaballoo Wolfowitz's uncivil behavior

Desired outcome

I propose a block of extended duration due to gross incivility.

Description

This user has a history of edit warring, removing content and, most prominently, uncivil comments (including edit summaries). His/her talk page alone shows how many times s/he has been warned in the past; why s/he gets so many chances is beyond me. In addition, s/he then goes on to call other users uncivil.

Evidence of disputed behavior

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

1. [1]
2. [2] (as stated above, his/her entire talk page says it all)

Applicable policies and guidelines

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

1. WP:CIVIL
2. WP:EDITWAR

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

1. [3]
2. [4]
3. [5]

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

1. Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 04:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.