User:FT2/Peter Damian arbitration evidence
< User:FT2
 | This page has been blanked as a courtesy. |
This page contains evidence related to a previous Arbitration decision. It has been courtesy blanked following close, and the page tagged as NOINDEX.
Any user needing to review the evidence at a future time should consult the page history, but note that the case is closed and not anticipated to be re-opened.
Commitment
[edit]I have made the following open and willing commitment to avoid the user concerned, regardless of the case, so far as practical and permitted:
- I'm fine with a restriction on commenting on the user, if this would help bring it to a close or anyone isn't sure if I would avoid him. I've avoided doing so wherever possible anyway (unasked) so this isn't new. I hereby undertake if any issue arises again, to avoid comment provided other admins will enforce the established norms WP:NPA, WP:HARASS and WP:AGF where these have been breached. If I am asked to explain some matter, I will do so, then drop the issue. If this is not sufficient I will seek normal dispute resolution rather than engage him. In all circumstances I will avoid him or commenting (other than in dispute resolution) on him, provided that it is understood I cannot prevent him involving himself with me, nor guide his words and actions if he does so. That is a commitment I give regardless of any motion in this case.
- (Note that for those on WR, I will do my best there but since it's a site where gossip spreads fast, my non-response relies upon his own avoidance. I will not speak to or about him there, as best I can. However this may be difficult if he were to post comments on me, or if others ask about matters where we have disagreement. I ask others to address any such, or to step in, so I don't need to. And ditto for the WR user [name not needed here], for reasons I don't need to go into.)
The user concerned has stated he is fine with this, in a diff in his initial evidence at RFAR.