User:Fx303

Emergence of A new Ideographic Language: Changing or moving icons and symbols in LCD displays. An Opinion.

The most obvious is the battery on your (insert electronic device) phone/player/whatever; it's simple to determine if such device is plugged in or running on batteries and if so how much charge remains by one glance at this icon. The Ac power plug or an animation reversed empty to full are a good indication of whether device is plugged in and the number of battery bars gives battery life. Flashing empty or similar means Low Battery Alert usually.

Why consider this a form of language? It is universal around the world where the technology reaches; but also seems to form a new language of itself because of this aspect, bypassing native and learned languages - using animated icons alone converys information. This language, if you will, "tells a similar story" understood by lots of different people. A glance conveys - 1/2 battery strength, 1 bar of signal, no data, volume muted, bluetooth, enabled, etc.

Well it seems to have a lot of power if you drop everything you're doing to find the charger?

Impact of Chinese folk mythology in the western scientific-technology paradigm - Personal experience recollection.

Headline text

    I am a first generation American and native English speaker which makes it even more interesting...  My parents immigrated to the US prior to 1950.  My father in late 1930s my mother late 1940s.  My father was Cantonese working class, he went through Ellis Island, served this country during WW2, and went to college on the GI bill, eventually getting a Ms in Chemical Engineering.  My mother was from weathier upbringing.  She obtainted an Engineering Mathematics degree; later she recieved an RN and worked in nursing until retirement.

Despite the education, both of them were very superstitious (in terms of folk mythology) people and remained so all their lives. I was raised a native English speaker, I know a handful of spoken phrases, not paricularly well. Despite this, the folk mythology was transferred quite intact. As a child I remember listening to the Three Kindoms and Monkey stories. Despite having almost a total immersion in western education to a technical degree myself, these early stories I've remembered after decades and must have become "part of me" very early on...Which appears to not be conflict with my westerniztion of thought and my eductation in "hard science" physics and engineering. Yet I see no contradiction with divining, "fortune telling", reincarnation, and similar so called parapsychological phenomena. These ideas run true with the tradational Chinese folk myths of parents so I have no problem to, as needed, use this frame of reference with which to view the data...

And furthermore, no need to supply "Scientific Explanations" - which I probably could using quantum mechanics - these myths have enough strength to hold their own in any situation.

These two things had been in constant conflict until I became a musician a 'storyteller', and I saw I could change roles completely. As 'storyteller' I only care about the story and telling it as best I can in the way I chose. Explanantion why no longer mattered (became secondary) to telling a good ( hit, popular ) story. And while composing it became clear: weave in scientific view with mythology view and get a story with elements of both, no contradictions. This ability did time and practice to get down, and I am no master of it (I suspect some people have in inborn natural talent though) by any means. I can only say it works, and it gets easier to do next time.

Perhaps this could be an example of "Art of War" when the enemy is a part of you; and to resolve conflict you "find a deviation to use" whatever the moment brings...

References: http://www.pinyin.info/readings/texts/ideographic_myth.html http://www.pinyin.info/readings/lu_xun/writing.html http://bellatryx.blogs.ie/category/philosophy/ http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/17405

Vector Energy Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Take material at this external link: http://members.triton.net/daveb/

It looks like the way it was done in the books, so I'll take it for granted from here on that Energy can be a vector. What does this mean?

It means I now have to remember to put a + or - in front of a lot of variables I didn't have to before...

OK, might it be worth all that?

Consider what is negative vector energy. + or - E. What is -E? - negative scalar energy!?!? But that doesn't exist...

Wait, I get it. It's like imaginary {sqrt(-1)}... imaginary energy? Oh, so when dealing with "the real world" I can just not deal with a lot of fuss by using the word "imaginary" and dismiss it semantically, as long as the math works. That might be worth using from time time...

Take this internal link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation

It follows you can derive an "offshoot" a ' Vector Energy' (using external link for math and theory framework) 'Interpreation of Quantum Mechanics'

replace the "backwards time-travelling virtual photon" in TIQM with "negative energy vector photon" that since you're dealing with negative energy you don't need to worry about it as long as the math work; & with much potential to (ab)-use something along the lines of:

Pair Production: Empty space absorbs a negative vector energy photon and emits a particle-antip artcle pair to conserve stuff.

instead of the void is full of virtual photons that borrow energy from uncertainty time to bring matter/energy --- as real particle-Antiparticle pairs --- from nothing and return them (Pair annihilation) before the delta time runs out out.

This ... might work better.

Try something else.

Does it get rid of weird stuff? Let's see, well sometimes, if you cannot deal with it you can use the "imaginary energy in real world" concept to ignore that part symantically as long as the math works; but if you wish for the 'mythological' or 'philosophy' aspects you can probably get a conversation or two with the concept of "imaginary energy", and in this case keep the symantic aspect.

Seems to work for me...

End of the VEIQM

Begin Interpretation of the Interpretation or "Commentary" Section

That was a really short interpretation of QM, wow. In fact it could be the shortest one. Wow. At least for now (5/2/08).

So I'll leave it at that size and put everything else in this new "Commentary" section...

Take material at this external link: http://members.triton.net/daveb/

along with this internal link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation

It follows you can derive an "offshoot" a ' Vector Energy' (using external link for math and theory framework) 'interpreation of Quantum Mechanics'

replace the "backwards time-travelling virtual photon" in TIQM with "negative energy vector photon" & make offshoot with potential to say something along the lines of:

Pair Production: Empty space absorbs a negative vector energy photon and emits a particle-antip artcle pair to conserve stuff.

Tunnel Effect: a particle in a classical PE well emits itself as a negative vector energy photon and disappears. Somewhere on other side of well, empty space absorbs a negative vector energy photon and and particle appears there.

Take material at this external link: http://members.triton.net/daveb/

along with this internal link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation

It follows you can derive an "offshoot" a ' Vector Energy' (using external link for math and theory framework) 'interpreation of Quantum Mechanics'

replace the "backwards time-travelling virtual photon" in TIQM with "negative energy vector photon" & make offshoot with potential to say something along the lines of:

Pair Production: Empty space absorbs a negative vector energy photon and emits a particle-antip artcle pair to conserve stuff.

Tunnel Effect: a particle in a classical PE well emits itself as a negative vector energy photon and disappears. Somewhere on other side of well, empty space absorbs a negative vector energy photon and and particle appears there.

Cool I have now received permission from the author of [http://members.triton.net/daveb/

]

Mike,

Permission is hereby granted.

Let me know if I can be of further assistance.

My latest project is very exciting. I can explain orbital precession with only SR and classical mechanics (No curved space). My formula has terms that differ from those derived from GR. I am close to explaining the gravitational anomaly of the Galileo flyby of Ganymede.

Good Luck.

DB

From: Mike Lee [1] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 10:58 AM To: daveb@triton.net Subject: Wish to reference your paper(s) for a Vector Transactional Interpretation of QM

Hello:

This is very interesting material, I just discovered it today. And the first implication that came to mind was “what does this do to the TIQM?” It seems you could have negative “energy vectors” replacing standard TM’s “virtual photons travelling backwards in time” and leads to something like ‘void absorbs a negative energy vector photon, to conserve lots of stull it emits a pair: particle antiparticle. Pair annihilates, a negative energy vector photon is emitted to conserve stuff. Tunneling – a particle winks out of existence, emitting –E photon, on other side of PE well, another –E photon is absorbed and the particle winks back into existence there; “seemingly having tunneled through a classical energy barrier”. And so forth…

I would like to request permission to reference your papers as idea origin and theory framework to develop.

Respectfully, mike

So now I can cite his work in the development of this idea - which can go off in many directions... Fx303 (talk) 09:16, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Vector Energy Revisited

What is antimatter? It would imply having antigravity in a sense, yet such is not the case. A photon is it's own antiparticle, so maybe gravity is its own anti force.

Look light travels in a straight line at the speed of light. The catch is enough matter bends spacetime and causes light to move in a curve.

Maybe light and matter are complementary. Light changes to matter and back to light - pair production

Hey, that sounds familiar. Maybe matter is a tensor thingy where antimatter annihilates with matter due to negative vector energy. We just don't see it because we think energy is scalar. Fx303 (talk) 05:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

______

What was I on when I wrote that.

Light - moves in a straight line at the speed of light Matter - has this gravity thing that tends to make bigger and bigger chunks of matter.

Matter when present in large (neutron star or so) can bend space time so light thinks it is moving in a straight line but is really a curving from one reference frame. With enough matter to form a black hole light bends around itself and goes in circles without a clue, thinking it is moving in a straight line.

That's kinda funny if you think about it. Fx303 (talk) 04:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)