Gratius Pannonius[edit]

My wikipedian ambitions and other things: I love all knoledge and hate all that is false and malicious. My goal is to, at least, make sense and reason in debated subjects, especially such with present influences. For, like it or not, there is almost always an objective truth, and that truth will eventually triumph, and I shall aid it. As such, My affection is first and foremost in subjects close to my heart and kin. Thus I reviewed the atricle of Jasenovac, the in-times overly ill-famed extermination-camp, to reach some sort of determination in it, and to experiment my knoledge in a true debate and academic article. For such is my heritage, that a hot debate, full of amotion (and that is against the cold, "academically-objective", heartless debates) and of claims, suppports and difficulties thrown upon the antagonist, is truelly enjoyeable, in line with the traditional "Gmara" (גמרא, Thalmud) debates. Ever have I like academic skeptism, but only so far. For one must not be overly selective in choice when no other account is at hand, while an inreliable source is like a biblical sine.

I see myself as the evangard of a generation of younger, more objective and lightheaded, however philosophic, that refrains of "cold" disscussions and deciptions. For history is a big and glorious story, alive and wide in nature of occurance, and also important, as a particualry favorable part of human lore, on my behalf. It is also, indeed, "the most hazardouos finding of the chemistry of the thought of nations", but it also vital to the everlasting conflict between cosmopolitics and patriotism. For I love my people, yet our own national history tells that the alter is also important, and that we respect ourselves by treating others fairly. Therefore, none can ever question my motives, for in doing so he will not only labor himself nihilistically (for I am myself's worst antangonist), but also question my word, as a proud man (and therefore leave chauvenist or egoistic conotations aside).

Yet for all of this, I also recon and like the "Mundus Glorius Classicus" of Rome and Greek, that is close (although in times despised) to my culture and historical tydings of my kin. For since childhood I grown of the tales of their times, and of the love of their lore, and the renmants of their culture. Nevertheless, I am, in assence, the everlasting optimalist, who likes the view that appears past the window as I type this, and that which will be there and elsewhere tommorow and otherwise. In times it is important, I believe, to screen out pure "Paltschef" (פלצ'ף, Philosophy), I.E. the labor of a debate that has no spirit or assence to it.