User:Grue/draft

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 22:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 20:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC).

A Man In Black (talk · contribs · logs)

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute

User:A Man In Black, who is also an administrator, frequently engages in edit wars over a large set of articles. His actions include replacing the entirety of the article with redirect and similar deletions of content. His actions are generally opposed by the editors of those articles, yet he continues editwarring, unwilling to search for consensus. Furthermore, he engages in such unsavory tactics, as searching through the history of user contributions and deleting the content they contributed (the practice commonly known as Wikistalking), further spreading edit wars into the areas previously untouched by his presence. Grue 23:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Desired outcome

The purpose of this RFC is to gather community consensus on whether User:A Man In Black's behavior is worthy of Wikipedia editor and admin, and whether he should be allowed to continue wikistalking and edit warring around Wikipedia, since apparently the change in his behavior at this point is unlikely. Grue 23:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Description

{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}

Evidence of disputed behavior

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

Applicable policies and guidelines

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

Other users who endorse this summary

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.