Jump to content

User:Isdewell/Towpath Cafe (London)/Maddiedufault Peer Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

General info

[edit]
Whose work are you reviewing?

Isdewell

Link to draft you're reviewing
User:Isdewell/Towpath Cafe (London)
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

Guiding questions:

  • The lead gives good insight into the restaurant and includes some interesting facts that shed light onto the vibe if the restaurant.
  • The lead could include brief insight into the contents to be mentioned in the page such as food type and the fact that they have publications.

Content

[edit]
  • All of the content is very relevant and it is neutral.
  • The content is up to date and includes information that makes the cafe unique, such as publications.
  • The article does not have any historic facts besides their publication. It would be helpful to include a brief history of the restaurant included when it started and how they have expanded.

Tone and Balance

[edit]
  • The content is generally neutral, there is a bit of language that could possibly be bias.
  • There could be a bit more content in regards to the food options of the restaurant or additional content about ownership and any other notable employees.

Sources and References

[edit]
  • Yes, all of the sources added are reliable.
  • The links and sources work, additionally they are not all published by the restaurant.

Organization

[edit]
  • The content is very well written, it sounds like a real interview.
  • There are no grammatical errors I have found.
  • The content is broken down into very ill organized sections. The subsections are also broken down very well in the publications section.

For New Articles Only

[edit]
  • Yes, the notability requirements are effective and clearly stated.
  • The article also includes a section that is clearly stated with the most general information.