Jump to content

User:Its the economy stupid/Dynamic Force Spectroscopy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dynamic Force Spectroscopy (DFS) is an analytical technique used to determine the kinetic and energetic characteristics of meta-stable states. The technique is applicable to meta-stable systems that, given enough time, will stochastically change configuration by thermal activation. By applying a steadily increasing force field, the activation energy barrier is lowered with time until 'escape' occurs. The rate of thermal activation thus becomes a function of time, and the typical force at which escape occurs depends on how quickly the force is increased. Hence the term Dynamic Force Spectroscopy was coined[1] to describe the spectrum of typical escape force versus the rate, or frequency, of increasing force.

Examples of applicable systems include ligand-receptor bonds, weak chemical bonds, magnetic polarization, macroscopic quantum tunneling...


Theoretical Model, Assumptions[edit]

Infinite-Barrier Model[edit]

Infinite-Barrier Statistics
pdf
Probability density function
Mean Force Spectrum
Probability density function
Parameters  : loading rate [N/s]
 : distance to transition state [m]
 : force-free transition rate [s-1]
Scaled Parameters  : dimensionless loading rate
 : thermal force scale [N]
Probability density function[2] (pdf)
Cumulative distribution function (cdf)
Survival function
Mean[3]
Mode[2]
Variance[4]


The infinite-barrier (or phenomenological) model assumes that the activation energy barrier to escape is sufficiently larger than the thermal energy (Boltzmann's constant times the temperature) such that any distortion of the barrier shape or location by the application of force can be neglected. This is not to say that the barrier is actually infinite. It is referred to as this simply because the derivation including a finite barrier (see below) gives this result in the limit of an infinitely high barrier. The barrier is in fact finite, however, it is large enough that the shape of the potential is not altered by the applied force. Therefore the effect of force acts only to lower the intrinsic activation energy barrier height, , by where is the load increasing linearly with time, and is the distance from the potential minimum to the barrier maximum (or transition state). The force-dependent energy barrier takes the form:

The kinetics of thermally-activated escape are assumed to follow the Arrhenius form[5],

where is the attempt frequency (or pre-exponential factor).

The time-dependent probability of the meta-stable state surviving up to a time is assumed to follow a first-order kinetic process such that the probability of re-entry to the state is zero,

,

where is the survival function, with initial conditions . Typically it is more intuitive to solve the above differential equation in terms of force with . Some statistical solutions for this model are shown in the table on the right. The derivations are left to the reader or can be found in the cited references.

Finite-Barrier Model[edit]

Finite-Barrier Statistics
pdf
Probability density function
Mean Force Spectrum
Probability density function
The dashed line is the infinite-barrier model
Parameters  : loading rate [N/s]
 : distance to transition state [m]
 : force-free transition rate [s-1]
 : activation energy barrier [J]
3/2 (linear-cubic), 1/2 (harmonic), 1 (infinite-barrier) [6]
Scaled Parameters  : dimensionless loading rate
 : thermal force scale [N]
 : critical force [N]
 : reduced force
Probability density function[7] (pdf)
Cumulative distribution function (cdf)
Survival function
Mean[4]
Mode[6]
Variance {{{variance}}}


... given by[7],


Experimental Methods[edit]

System-Dependent Parameters[edit]

Mechanical Magnetic Electric
row 2, cell 2 row 2, cell 3
row 3, cell 2 row 3, cell 3

References[edit]

  1. ^ Merkel, R.; et al. (1999), "Energy landscapes of receptor-ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy", Nature, 397 (6714): 50–53, doi:10.1038/16219, PMID 9892352 {{citation}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
  2. ^ a b Evans, E. (1997), "Dynamic Strength of Molecular Adhesion Bonds", Biophys. J., 72 (4): 1541–1555, doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78802-7, PMC 1184350, PMID 9083660 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ Gergely, C.; et al. (2000), "Unbinding process of adsorbed proteins under external stress studied by atomic force microscopy spectroscopy", Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 97 (20): 10802–10807, doi:10.1073/pnas.180293097, PMC 27104, PMID 10984503 {{citation}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
  4. ^ a b Friddle, R.W. (2008), "Unified model of dynamic forced barrier crossing in single molecules", Phys. Rev. Lett., 100 (13): 138302, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.138302, PMID 18518003
  5. ^ Bell, G.I. (1978), "Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells", Science, 200 (4342): 618–627, doi:10.1126/science.347575, PMID 347575
  6. ^ a b Dudko, O.K.; et al. (2006), "Intrinsic Rates and Activation Free Energies from Single-Molecule Pulling Experiments", Phys. Rev. Lett., 96 (10): 108101, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.108101, PMID 16605793 {{citation}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
  7. ^ a b Garg, A. (1995), "Escape-field distribution for escape from a metastable potential well subject to a steadily increasing bias field", Phys. Rev. B, 51 (21): 15592–15595, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.51.15592, PMID 9978526