User:Jawgarci/HLM/Bibliography
You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.
Bibliography
As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:
|
Bibliography
[edit]Edit this section to compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source
- McAvay, Haley. “Immigrants’ Spacial Incorporation in Housing and Neighborhoods: Evidence from France.” Population (English Edition, 2002-) 73, no. 2 (2018): 333-62
- This is a peer-reviewed journal, meaning it should be a credible source. It investigates the housing outcomes in France in relation to immigrant communities.
- Glaes, Gillian. "Policing the Post-Colonial Order: Surveillance and the African Immigrant Community in France, 1960-1979." Historical Reflections / Réflexions Historiques 36, no. 2 (2010): 108-26.
- This is a peer-reviewed article, another credible source on the history leading up to the creation of HLM. This article tells the migration of people from Africa to France in the 1960’s discussing France’s role as a colonial power.
- Nasiali, Minayo. "Citizens, Squatters, and Asocials: The Right to Housing and the Politics of Difference in Post-Liberation France." The American Historical Review 119, no. 2 (2014): 434-59
- This is a journal review on the housing rights to housing in France and the differences in housing views.
Rosello, M. (1997). French Bidonvilles in the 1960s: Urban & individual initiatives. Renaissance and Modern Studies, 40(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735789709366607
References
[edit]Outline of proposed changes
[edit]Click on the edit button to draft your outline.
Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.
In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality. Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further. Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap. |