Jump to content

User:JenPatt87/Twitter verification/Reham321 Peer Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

General info

[edit]
Whose work are you reviewing?

JenPatt87

Link to draft you're reviewing
Twitter verification sandbox
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Twitter verification

Evaluate the drafted changes

[edit]

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead - The lead has been updated to reflect the new content added. Great improvement has been made in this section. It's now more precise and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead does not include information that is not present in the article. If I were to improve anything, it'd be including a brief description of the article's major sections.

Content - The content added is extremely relevant to the topic, up-to-date, and belongs. It's great that you you included the History and Controversy, as well as the Social influence of verified accounts and losing verified status sections. As you continue to build this content out or finetune as you go along, I'm sure your new additions will take the article to the next level.

Tone - All the content that's been added is neutral, I don't see any claims that appear to be heavily biased toward a particular position or view points that are over-/under-represented. Even the section detailing the scrutiny Twitter received in 2017, its stated in a very neutral way that sticks to the facts. The content added does not attempt to persuade the reading in either direction.

Sources and References - All the content is backed up by a reliable secondary source of information. It looks as if the content accurately reflects what the cited sources say. The sources you've pulled from look varied and there's a healthy mix of different kinds of sources, all reliable, current, and with a diverse spectrum of authors. I believe you've also included a peer-reviewed article which is great!

Organization - The content added is well organized, well written, and despite doing an editorial sweep; I found no errors.

Images and Media - This is a tricky one because there's an existing image of the twitter verification badge. I'm not sure that any other images would be relevant to add.

Overall impressions - Great job! I love the topic you decided on, and the content added has tremendously improved the overall quality of the article. It's more complete and best of all, the new sections you've added are specifically what the article was in need of.