epithets[edit]

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:djSwKfxbUCYJ:www.adc.org/index.php%3Fid%3D2173++webster+anti-semitism+site:www.adc.org&hl=en is www.adc.org/index.php?id=2173

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:_D4ZtBn62IQJ:www.adc.org/index.php%3Fid%3D2172++webster+anti-semitism+site:www.adc.org&hl=en is www.adc.org/index.php?id=2172

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:X7HAQTHYK6AJ:www.adc.org/index.php%3Fid%3D2176++webster+anti-semitism+site:www.adc.org&hl=en is www.adc.org/index.php?id=2176

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:y_ozZKbqMcYJ:www.adc.org/index.php%3Fid%3D2175++webster+anti-semitism+site:www.adc.org&hl=en is www.adc.org/index.php?id=2175

Picture[edit]

Humus, I disagree with the removal of this picture. At most what it needs is a better caption. Clearly it expresses anti-Arab sentiment. Whether it was actually written by the JDL or not, or even by an Arab, or Yuber himself is besides the point. Suppose there was anti-Semitic graffiti in the anti-semitism article, signed Hamas and that it was later shown to be a hoax, perpetrated say by some mentally disturbed rabbi. Would it then not belong in that article? I don't think so, it would be if anything even more notable. Though there are exceptions, I think it is reasonable to assume that anti-Semitic or anti-Arab statements are generally made by anti-Semites and Arab-haters, rather than people just trying to make the other side look bad, or fake the existence of a problem.

Is it really surprising though that one could find such a thing in Hebron? - on all reports there are settlers there with such sentiments and who like to express them. While I was writing this I noted that a book I have, The Alster Files, by a Kahanist, complains how a friend of his was (unjustly IMHO) sentenced to jail for a graffiti of a pig on a wall in Hebron captioned "Mohammed is a pig." I agree, the image makes the JDL look bad, perhaps unjustly - perhaps it was wriiten by an Arab-hater not affiliated with the JDL, or John Doe Longfellow - but to make an encyclopedic addition, you might want to get a statement from the JDL claiming or disclaiming responsibility for this particular graffiti. You could enlarge the caption to cast more doubt on its provenance, hopefully in agreement with 209.176.194.19, who I also suggest should start talking rather than reverting. Neutrality dictates that one do the same in other similar, e.g. anti-Semitic cases. Of course it would be better, one could be surer it was not a hoax if it came say from the New York Times rather than Yuber (I'm pretty sure I've read of anti-Arab Graffiti in Hebron in the NYT or similarly respectable sources), but then it would not be in Wikipedia because of copyright - this is a universal problem on Wikipedia. --John Z 08:04, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

ZTPTIT[edit]

This report[2] to Ralph Bunche contains all three phrases.

Lebanon's Daily Star (translations from Arab press)[3] or [4]

Pre-state Zionist terrorism

[5]

Statement issued by the National and Islamic Forces

After the Terror: a book and further thoughts

Askar Camp: A Story of Zionist Terrorism and Legendary Courage

[9] =[10]