User:Kalista Malette/Antiporter/Msimm007 Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? Kalista Malette
• Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Kalista Malette/sandbox

Lead

Lead evaluation

The lead is updated with new information as well as keeping relevant information that was already present in the original article. The lead includes an introductory sentence that describes the articles overall topic. The lead describes the sections that will be talked about later in the article. The lead is concise and straight to the point, not overly detailed.

Content

Content evaluation

The content added is relevant to the topic and up to date. The content present is relevant. The user could potentially add another example of an antiporter but overall the information is there.

Tone and Balance

Tone and balance evaluation

The content added is neutral with no claims that appear to be biased. No viewpoints are over or underrepresented, and their is no persuasion involved, the article is more informational.

Sources and References

Sources and references evaluation

All new content is backed up with reliable, up-to-date sources, and reflect relevenat literature to the topic. The links to the sources work and are written by a few authors.

Organization

Organization evaluation

The content added is well-written, concise and easy to understand. There were no noticable grammatical errors. The content added is broken into 2 sections and well-organized.

Images and Media

Images and media evaluation

There are no images in the review article, but in the original article the images give a better understanding of the topic. An image could be added to the review that could tie the new sections together.

Overall impressions

Overall evaluation

The content added improved the overall quality of the article and makes it more complete. Good demonstration of a type of antiporter is used, could maybe add another type of antiporter to make a new section. Overall, the article is well written and is a great improvement from the original article.