User:Lalevi/User:Lalevi/Seahawks Dancers/Elizabethpopoff Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Lalevi
• Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Lalevi/Seahawks Dancers

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
  • Yes, Lalevi provides a lead into the Seahawks Dancers that is coherent with the information in the article.
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
  • Yes, the introductory sentence is a great overview about what I am going to read about, Seahawks Dancers, in the majority of her wikipedia page.
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
  • No, however since the information is brief on the major sections in the article, it would be a good idea to add a brief descriptions if there is addition to the page's sections.
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
  • No, the lead is relevant to what is provided.
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
  • It is concise and gets right to the point of what the article is about.

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic?
  • Yes the content added is relevant to the topic.
• Is the content added up-to-date?
  • Yes, the information and the content from the links is up-to-date in due to the continuous updating of the links provided within the Wikipedia page.
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
  • I believe there could be addition of the history of the Seahawks Dancers and information/skill level of what the dancers need to prepare for auditions in the audition section of the page. When I was writing my personal article I found finding history of my topic to be very difficult to locate, but maybe it could be something to look into for this particular topic? It could also be a fun addition to add the updating of Seahawk dancers outfits and pictures with it.
• Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
  • I believe this article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?
  • Yes the content that is added is neutral.
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
  • No there are not any claims that are heavily biased.
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
  • No viewpoints that are either overrepresented or underrepresented.I think it was a super cool addition of adding the males and the junior Seahawk Dancers history into the article as that would be a viewpoint that was underrepresented!
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
  • Not at all does the content attempt to persuade the reader.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
  • Yes and No. Some of the sources are from facebook pages which could just be the most reliable source for this topic but I do not know if there are more reliable ones.
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
  • I think there could be more sources that dive into the history of Seahawks Dances which can be another available piece of literature to add within the article.
• Are the sources current?
  • Yes the sources are current as they continue to update their own pages regularly.
• Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
  • I believe the sources could be more diverse in due to the addition of the content mentioned previously.
• Check a few links. Do they work?
  • Yes the links work perfectly!

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
  • Yes, the content added is well-written. It provides a clear understanding for the reader what the Seahawks Dancers are and what they are about.
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
  • I did not see any grammatical or spelling errors while reading the article.
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
  • Yes the content is well-organized and the sections are broken down into appropriate topics that allows easy reading for the viewer.

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
  • Yes, however I think the image could be replaced with a broader image of the Seahawks Dancers without the mascot. This could be a greater addition to the article as only three dancers are portrayed on the page.
• Are images well-captioned?
  • Yes, simple and straight to the point about what the picture is portraying.
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
  • I believe the image included adhere's to Wikipedias copyright regulations.
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
  • Yes as the image is to the right of the article catching the reader's eye in an appealing way while reading the page.

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
  • N/A
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
  • N/A
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
  • N/A
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
  • N/A

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
  • Yes the article is more complete however it would be exciting to see more additions to the article about the history the Seahawks Dancers, their outfits, the skill level that is required, and maybe the games they attend regularly. It was super cool to read the changes of the article and I feel like I have a greater understanding of the topic now!
• What are the strengths of the content added?
  • The content added provides more of a complete article that I would be intrigued to read once posted. It provides females who have been involved with Seahawks Dancers and their particular link, making it very exciting to read and interesting to see their paths as dancers now. Overall, I think your additions made this page more complete and captivating to read!
• How can the content added be improved?
  • I believe the content added can be improved by making the page for visually appealing to the reader. Moving the content could be one way to do this!