User:LebesgueStieltjes/proofs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proof of Pithagoras's Theorem using differential equation[edit]

The statement of the theorem is well-konwn: Given a right triangle with legs and hypotenuse , the following equality holds

Failed to parse (unknown function "\LARGE"): {\displaystyle \LARGE a^2+b^2=c^2}

Right triangle modified

As seen on the figure, if is sufficiently small, the triangle can be considered as a right-angled triangle, similar to the original triangle with the following correspondence:
Failed to parse (unknown function "\LARGE"): {\displaystyle \LARGE\frac{a}{c}=\frac{dc}{da}}
This leads to the integral formula as follows:
Failed to parse (unknown function "\Large"): {\displaystyle \Large \int a\text{ } \mathrm{d}a = \int c\text{ } \mathrm{d}c }
The solution gives us the equation. The value of the constant is determined by the initial value problem, because if , then . This leads us to the desired result

Can computers answer any question?[edit]

One might ask: if I can describe a problem or ask a question (yes/no for the sake of simplicity) in a well-defined language, is there always an algorithm which answers it correctly? Formally, given an alphabet, a language is a set of words, each word consisting of letters of that alphabet. We say, that a language is decidable if for an arbitrary word there is an algorithm, that decides whether the word is in or not. Is there such an algorithm for every language?
Assume, that every algorithm is a word of the given alphabet - for example if the alphabet is binary, we know that every algorithm can be translated into ones and zeros. An algorithm works as follows: it gets a word as input and answers with yes or no or runs forever - think of endless loops. Now fix a special language . If and only if is a code of an algorithm and if we give as an input for that algorithm - remember, is also a word - then the answer is no.
Now assume, that the algorithm, that decides if for every word, exists. By the existence of that algorithm we also mean, that it is also a word - denoted by - , as every algorithm is. If , then the answer for is yes, but it also means, that the algorithm answers no for the input . Likewise, if the answer is no, i.e. , then should be accepted by itself which leads to contradiction in both cases, so we found a question with no algorithm deciding it.

Explicit formula for the Fibonacci numbers[edit]

The Fibonacci-series is defined by a recursion: and , . Of course, we can easily calculate the first few element, but there is an exact formula, that calculates without knowing the previous ones.
First of all, we calculate the generator function: . Using the definition of we obtain, that , thus . Factoring the denominator we get Failed to parse (unknown function "\LARGE"): {\displaystyle \LARGE f(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\left(\frac{1}{1-\frac{2x}{\sqrt{5} - 1}}-\frac{1}{1-\frac{2x}{\sqrt{5}+1}}\right)}

Thus the generator function is the sum of two geometric series:
Comparing the coefficient of leads to