User:Looganealabbas/Punu people /Johns9ea Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? Looganealabbas
• Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Looganealabbas/newsandbox

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
  • There is no lead for the article.
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic?
  • Yes.
• Is the content added up-to-date?
  • Yes. The content is from 2008.
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
  • No.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?
  • Yes.
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
  • No.
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
  • No.
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
  • No.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
  • I'm assuming it is. I do not have access to the book used.
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
  • I found a few articles that had more information regarding Punu art, but the information added is useful.
• Are the sources current?
  • Yes. They are from 2008.
• Check a few links. Do they work?
  • Yes.

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
  • It is written in a way that makes sense.
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
  • There are a few sentences that could be split up into two. For example, I would write: "The masks are life size, they can cover a persons face, they are worn by the dancers in south Gabon." as "The masks are life sized, meaning that they cover a person's entire face. They are worn by dancers in South Gabon."
  • I see no spelling errors.
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
  • Yes. My only suggestion is to have the heading say "Art" rather than "Punu Art" since it is already an article about the Punu.

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
  • Yes.
• Are images well-captioned?
  • The caption could include the type of mask it is.
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
  • I believe so.
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
  • To enhance the appeal of the image, I would place it to the right of the information rather than at the bottom.

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
  • Yes. Adding this section helps the future reader understand more about Punu culture.
• What are the strengths of the content added?
  • The information is clear and helpful. It is cited correctly.
• How can the content added be improved?
  • There are a few grammar mistakes as well as sentences that could be cleaned up a little bit. I would add more information about the masks and maybe even another section about a different kind of Punu art.