User:Lperkins5825/Archaeology of Oman/Bobadillag Peer Review

Peer review

General info

• Reviewing Lperkins5825
• User:Lperkins5825/sandbox

Lead

Lead evaluation

Logan will be updating the lead to make it flow better with the entire article. The lead overall is concise with the article and provides enough information to introduce the contents to the reader. I believe that all the information in the lead is stated throughout the article, unless different or additional content will be added later on.

Content

Content evaluation

The content that will be added are relevant to the article and up-to-date. I think the spots where Logan pointed out where some sections needed to be merged together make sense for the flow of the article. I don't think that the article does deal with Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

Tone and balance evaluation

The overall tone is neutral and has no biases. Viewpoints of the article is represented equally and it does not make the reader favor one position over another.

Sources and References

Sources and references evaluation

The additional sources that Logan will be adding are new and fit the article and its contents well. All the links provided in the draft work and are relatively current.

Organization

Organization evaluation

The article draft is well organized, clear to read and descriptive. The overall plan for what sections are to merged together suites the flow of what is trying to be achieves. In the draft Logan has stated the grammatical errors that need to be fixed.

Images and Media

Images and media evaluation

No images or media were used in the draft yet.

Overall impressions

Overall evaluation

The draft is thought out with what changes were going to be made and how new information will be added. Overall looks good so far and seems complete with what Logan is going for in the article. A strength that Logan has done is catch the grammatical errors that the article had and knowing how to replace it to make the article make sense to the reader.