User:MacMed/Dragon Ball Z Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This is NOT a GA review, it is a peer review. Place comments and replies below the checklist.

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   The text is pretty choppy, put some commas in there instead of periods.

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   Maybe put a some sources into the "Playable Characters" section. It has no citations as of 21:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC).

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

   Good job on getting the scope of the game.

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

   Good collaboration and talk page discussion.

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: