User:Martin Hogbin/MHP - Not the original choice
Please look at the explanation below, try to understand it then respond as requested in the 'What did you think' section.
Brief reminder of the problem
[edit]Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?
For more detail and clarification go back to the problem.
Explanation
[edit]An intuitive explanation is to reason that a player whose strategy is to switch loses if and only if the player initially picks the car, which happens with probability 1/3, so switching must win with probability 2/3 (Carlton 2005).
What did you think of this explanation?
[edit]Please just sign in the one section that best describes what you opinion of this explanation. If none apply or you want to make a comment of any kind please do so on the talk page for this solution.
I did not follow it
[edit]I was not at all persuaded by it
[edit]It made me start to doubt my answer
[edit]It made me start to think the answer really was 2/3
[edit]It completely convinced me that the answer was 2/3
[edit]Click here to go back and try another explanation.