User:Morgan.kelley123/Brachyspira pilosicoli/Tiffany.chl903 Peer Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer review[edit]

General info[edit]

Tone and Balance[edit]

The content added (Zoonotic Potential) has a tone that is neutral, clear, and shows no heavy bias towards a particular position. A wide host range is explained without any particular gap of information and without any attempt to persuade the favouring of one position or another.

Sources and references evaluation[edit]

The content is backed up by reliable secondary sources of information, all appearing to be relevant and current. There are scientific articles written by numerous authors and the content utilizes multiple different sources to compose a detailed view of zoonotic potential.

Organization evaluation[edit]

The content is well-written, clear. Content may be a little hard to read due to density - this can perhaps be aided by visuals (images/media) or hyperlinks to certain diseases such as porcine intestinal spirochaetosis. Paragraphs may also be broken down to subheadings if possible to facilitate reading. Otherwise, there are no grammatical or spelling errors and the content is well-organized and easy to follow.