User:Muhyul Go/Ruth W. Nduati/Lxy80 Peer Review

Peer review -completed

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

• Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Muhyul Go
• Link to draft you're reviewing: Ruth W. Nduati

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation

This article is very established with its own contents, therefore my peer is improving on this article than starting from stretch. Overall the lead is very informative and my classmate has provided some important information about this person's education background. To me the lead is perfect in the sense that I do not see anything needs to be change or improved upon.

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic?
• Is the content added up-to-date?
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation

For content, there is not much information being added for the section in "Early career and education", I will consider this is a minor edit even though it is not related to gramma or sentence flow.

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation

The tone is neutral for things that are added. There is also no claims or biases in the content.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
• Are the sources current?
• Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation

Yes the article is very up to date as it is reflected in the current work section, where the author included coronavirus update. The articles uses some of the primary sources in " Work against HIV" section as they cite the published papers of the character that they are covering and provided a summary on those. To me this is fine as secondary source commenting about one's work will be very difficult to find and rare. Therefore it makes sense to use primary sources in this section.

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation

Yes, I think the article is very well written, it has a nice flow, concise and coherent throughout the page.

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
• Are images well-captioned?
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation

Not Applicable

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

• Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
• How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
• Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
• Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

New Article Evaluation

Not Applicable

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
• What are the strengths of the content added?
• How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation

I feel that this article is very difficult to be improved further as previous edits on this article has provided a very thorough information on Dr Nduati. Therefore it can be difficult to find any new information about a person.

^ I don't know how to reply but thank you! I'll take your suggestion to improve the Early career and education section.