User:NAL77/Evaluate an Article
Evaluate an article[edit]
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Name of article: (Environmental science)
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
- I choose to evaluate this article because I have an interest in Environmental Science
Lead[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- The introductory sentence is not the most concise, but it does clearly describe the article's topic.
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- The Lead does include a brief description of the article's major sections.
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- The Lead does include information that is not present in the article.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
- The Lead is a bit long and has more detail than needed.
Lead evaluation- The lead is overall pretty good.[edit]
Content[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- The article's content is relevant to the topic/
- Is the content up-to-date?
- Yes, the content is up-to-date.
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- There is no content missing and there is no content that does not belong.
Content evaluation- the content is overall very good.[edit]
Tone and Balance[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral?
- Yes, the article is neutral.
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- There aren't any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- There are no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented.
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- The article does not attempt to persuade the reader.
Tone and balance evaluation- the tone and balance are overall pretty good.[edit]
Sources and References[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- The facts in the article are backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- The sources are thorough and they do reflect the available literature on the topic.
- Are the sources current?
- Yes, the sources are current.
- Check a few links. Do they work?
- The links do work.
Sources and references evaluation- the sources and references are overall very good.[edit]
Organization[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- The article is well-written. It is easy to read, clear, and overall concise.
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- The article does not have any spelling or grammatical errors.
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- The article is well-organized. It is broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic.
Organization evaluation- the organization is overall very good.[edit]
Images and Media[edit]
- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- The article does include images that enhance the understanding of the topic.
- Are images well-captioned?
- The images are well-captioned.
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- The images do adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations.
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
- The images are laid out in a visually appealing way.
Images and media evaluation- the images and media are overall very good.[edit]
Checking the talk page[edit]
- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
- There are insightful and engaging conversations that are going on behind the scenes.
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
- The article is rated C-class. It is a part of three WikiProjects, for Environment, Technology, and Science.
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
- Wikipedia is more in depth with this topic.
Talk page evaluation- the talk page is overall pretty good.[edit]
Overall impressions[edit]
- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status?
- The article's overall status is that it is rated C-class.
- What are the article's strengths?
- The organization, which is one of the article's strength, is extremely well. Also, the tone of the article is very well since it doesn't try to persuade the reader.
- How can the article be improved?
- The lead can be more concise.
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
- The article is mostly well-developed, but it is missing just a little information.
Overall evaluation- overall the article is very good.[edit]
Optional activity[edit]
- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: